Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40836806›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025

Placental mitochondria in high-altitude pregnancy: metabolic adaptations and a toolkit for respiratory assessment.

Andrew Murray, Jenna Armstrong, Katie O'Brien

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Pregnancy at high altitude: evolutionary and historical perspectives.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Pregnancy at high altitude: the challenge of hypoxia.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew MurrayDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0929-9315
Jenna ArmstrongDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EL, UK.
Katie O'BrienDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EL, UK.

Funding

Action Medical ResearchBill and Melinda Gates FoundationEvelyn TrustH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsPhilomathia FoundationResearch Councils UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ascent to high altitude is accompanied by physiological responses that, to an extent, mitigate the challenge of hypobaric hypoxia, maintaining arterial oxygen content and convective oxygen delivery. Nevertheless, arterial oxygen tension (

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAltitudeMitochondriaPlacentaFemaleHumansOxygenPregnancyOxygenhigh altitudemetabolismmitochondriaplacentapregnancy

Identifiers

PMID40836806
PMCPMC12368547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.