ReviewCurrent opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery2025
Intraoperative imaging during head and neck reconstruction.
Review in Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo review current intraoperative imaging techniques utilized in head and neck reconstruction, with a focus on applications in vascular perfusion assessment, bony reconstruction, and improved intraoperative visualization and education. RECENT
findingsIn recent years, there have been both technological advances as well as increased implementation of imaging techniques in head and neck reconstruction. To assess for real-time flap perfusion, indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG) has become increasingly adopted, allowing for early identification of vascular compromise and improved flap viability. In bony reconstruction, intraoperative CT and navigation systems have enhanced the precision of osteotomies and hardware placement. Emerging technologies such as the exoscope system have also contributed to improved intraoperative visualization, surgical planning, and education for trainees and multidisciplinary teams. SUMMARY: Intraoperative imaging continues to advance the safety and precision of head and neck reconstruction. Techniques such as ICG, intraoperative navigation, and augmented visualization tools support better decision-making, reduced complication rates, and enhanced surgical education. Ongoing investigation is needed to standardize protocols, integrate quantitative thresholds for perfusion and bony alignment, and more widely implement technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.