SynthesisThoracic cancer2025
Rescue Surgery for Advanced Stage Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Thoracic cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Rescue Surgery for Advanced Stage Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review.Thoracic cancer · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with advanced lung cancer are candidates for systemic therapies. In the context of improved tumor responses and prolonged survival periods, the treatment of tumor/therapy-related complications must be taken into account. Rescue surgery consists of a surgical resection without oncologic purpose but with the aim of controlling an acute and life-threatening complication. We evaluated the postoperative outcomes of patients with advanced stage lung cancer who underwent rescue surgery for tumor or therapy-related life-threatening complications. We conducted a systematic review of literature using PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar using following keywords: ("rescue surgery" or "salvage surgery" or "salvage lung resection") and ("lung cancer" or "non-small cell lung cancer" or "NSCLC" or "SCLC"). The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes were the morbidity and mortality. Nine articles were included in our review for a total of 64 patients. The most common indications for rescue surgery were lung abscess, post-obstructive pneumonia, hemoptysis, and empyema. The lung resection consisted of lobectomy (n = 31, 48%), bilobectomy (n = 5, 8%), pneumonectomy (n = 11, 17%), sleeve pneumonectomy (n = 15, 23%), sleeve lobectomy (n = 1, 2%), and segmentectomy (n = 1, 2%). The mean overall survival was 12 months; the postoperative complication rate was 51%. No intraoperative deaths were observed. Rescue surgery is feasible for patients with advanced lung cancer and tumor/therapy-related life-threatening complications. Rescue surgery may allow access to ulterior systemic therapies; but the risk-benefit imbalance should always be taken into account, considering this as a last resort treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.