ArticleInsect science2025
Predation pressure on sentinel prey does not necessarily diminish with advancing urbanization.
Article in Insect science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urbanization, one of the most significant global environmental issues of our time, causes significant environmental and structural changes in natural or seminatural habitat patches. These urbanization-related changes trigger significant impact on ecological interactions and functioning. Predation is one of the most important ecological interactions, and urbanization-related changes on predation pressure may have substantial ecological consequences. We studied predation pressure over a full season (from April to October) in rural versus urban forests using the sentinel approach in and around a large city (Debrecen) in the eastern part of the Great Hungarian Lowland. Model caterpillars made of nondrying green plasticine were readily attacked by arthropods, birds and mammals. From attack marks left by potential predators, a relatively high predation pressure was documented: up to 36% of the caterpillars exposed for 24 h showed attack marks. Seasonal differences were also obvious, with predation pressure during summer being significantly higher than in spring or autumn. This trend held for overall attack rates, also for attacks by arthropods and mammals but not birds. Surprisingly, attack rates were often higher in urban than rural habitats, contradicting the general hypothesis that predation pressure is lower in urbanized areas. As attack rates depend on both predator abundance and activity, and general data indicate lower predator abundances in urban habitats, this phenomenon may have been caused by hungrier predators in urban forest fragments or by the predator relaxation/safe habitat hypothesis that argues that a reduced need for vigilance allows more time to search for prey.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.