Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40836496›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2025

Exploring the interaction between cannabis and music.

Lena Darakjian, Harley Glassman, Chi Yhun Lo, Frank A Russo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Exploring the interaction between cannabis and music.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lena DarakjianDepartment of Psychology, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0009-0008-8610-1086
Harley GlassmanDepartment of Psychology, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1911-2489
Chi Yhun LoDepartment of Psychology, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7695-3148
Frank A RussoDepartment of Psychology, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2939-6358

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cannabis use has long been associated with enhanced music experiences, yet scientific research on its effects on auditory perception remains limited. This convergent mixed-methods self-report study investigated how recreational cannabis users experience auditory stimulation and music in particular. A total of 104 participants completed an online questionnaire, 15 of which were selected to participate in an optional semi-structured interview. Quantitative analyses showed that listening to music was the most commonly reported activity while high, indicated by 45% of participants. Participants reported significantly greater hearing sensitivity (p < 0.001) and state absorption in music (p < 0.001) while high compared to sober. Higher trait absorption in music was associated with greater state absorption in music while high. Qualitative thematic analysis identified four main themes: (1) altered cognitive processes and reinterpretations, (2) auditory perceptual effects from new sensations to sensory overload, (3) emotional openness, sensitivity, and regulation, and (4) embodiment, immersion, and out-of-body dissociation. This study provides a novel theoretical framework to understand the complex interactions between cannabis and musical experience.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionCannabisMusicAcoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultabsorptioncannabishearingmusicreward

Identifiers

PMID40836496
PMCPMC12448268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.