Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40836425›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025

Screening Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Chinese Adults: Optimizing STOP-Bang and NoSAS Cutoff Values.

Xiaojun Zhan, Yang Gao, Zhifu Sun, Chan Wu, Linyin Yao, Wen Hu, Xing Gao, Jia Liu, Yifan Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xiaojun ZhanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Capital Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yang GaoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Zhifu SunDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Chan WuSleep Medicine Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Linyin YaoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wen HuDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Capital Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xing GaoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Capital Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jia LiuDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Capital Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yifan LiuDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Capital Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND This retrospective study of 3129 individuals aimed to screen obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with the modified STOP-Bang questionnaire (SBQ) and Neck, Obesity, Snoring, Age, Sex (NoSAS) scores, establish more appropriate cutoff values for these 2 questionnaires in Chinese patients, and investigate whether adding minimum oxygen saturation (LSpO2) as an item could improve the ability of these questionnaires. MATERIAL AND METHODS We collected polysomnography data, demographic data, anthropometric measurements, and the SBQ and NoSAS scores from 3129 participants. The ability of the SBQ and NoSAS score with different cutoff values to detect OSA was assessed. RESULTS In the SBQ, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was maximized with the cutoff value of 4 in women, and the AUC values were 0.682 (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] ³5/h), 0.680 (AHI ³15/h), and 0.694 (AHI v30/h). For men, with a cutoff value of 5, the AUCmax values were 0.655 (AHI ≥5/h), 0.632 (AHI ≥15/h), and 0.624(AHI ≥30/h). For women, the optimal NoSAS score cutoff values were 8 (AHI ≥5/h and AHI ≥15/h) and 10 (AHI ≥30/h), and the AUCmax values were 0.687, 0.649, and 0.662. For men, the optimal NoSAS score cutoff value was 12, and the AUCmax values were 0.628, 0.618, and 0.626. When LSpO2 <85% was added as an item to these 2 questionnaires, all AUC values increased. CONCLUSIONS We recommend using new cutoff values in the SBQ and NoSAS scores in Chinese patients and adding LSpO2 <85% in these 2 questionnaires for predicting OSA.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningSleep Apnea, ObstructiveAdultAgedArea Under CurveChinaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolysomnographyRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSnoringSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40836425
PMCPMC12379744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.