SynthesisActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2026
Prognostic factors for wound complications after childbirth-related perineal trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic factors for wound complications after childbirth-related perineal trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAlthough childbirth-related perineal trauma affects the majority of women after vaginal birth, very few healthcare resources are allocated to reducing morbidity from perineal trauma. Wound complications are frequent after perineal trauma has been sustained; however, we know little about which factors are predictive of developing a wound issue. To target possible interventions effectively, it is crucial that those at higher risk are identified. Here, we perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors for sustaining wound complications after childbirth-related perineal trauma. MATERIAL AND
methodsMedline, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL were searched from inception to December 2024 using relevant search terms. There were no restrictions on language or year of publication. Observational studies that investigated two or more potential prognostic factors for wound complications after childbirth related-perineal trauma, where adjusted risks were calculated, were eligible for inclusion. We included all types of tears, sustained through spontaneous or assisted vaginal birth. Meta-analysis was performed where five or more studies investigated a particular prognostic factor for perineal wound complications. Odds ratios (ORs) were pooled using a random effects model. The review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023458738).
resultsFifteen studies were eligible for inclusion, involving 71409 women. Studies included were published between 2006 and 2024 across six different countries. Assisted vaginal birth (10 studies, 65 375 women: OR 2.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.89-4.06) was a significant risk factor for wound complication. Raised body mass index (six studies, 64 770 women: OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.56-3.18) was not a significant risk factor. Prolonged second stage of labor, smoking, and episiotomy were each investigated in three primary studies; therefore, data was insufficient for meta-analysis; however, individual studies indicated that there might be an association with perineal wound complication.
conclusionsAssisted vaginal birth is a significant risk factor for perineal wound complication after childbirth-related perineal trauma. Overall, there are limited studies investigating prognostic factors for perineal wound complication after childbirth related-perineal trauma. Whilst we highlight potential prognostic factors, we recommend that a robust, well-powered primary research study with clearly defined wound complication outcomes and prognostic factors is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.