Observational studyInternational journal of dermatology2026
Incidence, Risk Factors, and Management of Conjunctivitis in Atopic Dermatitis Patients Treated With Dupilumab or Tralokinumab: Results From a Multicenter, Observational, Retrospective Study.
Observational study in International journal of dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The molecular mechanism of the adverse effects of the biological and small molecular drugs in the therapy of inflammatory skin diseases - psoriasis and atopic dermatitis.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Long-Term Ocular Outcomes of Dupilumab in Atopic Dermatitis: Results From the BioDay Registry.Clinical and translational allergy · 2026Article
- From Barrier Disruption and Immune Dysregulation to Targeted Therapies in Atopic Dermatitis.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2026Review
- Dupilumab versus tralokinumab in atopic dermatitis: A propensity score adjusted comparison from BioDay.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
51 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConjunctivitis is among the most frequent adverse events (AEs) emerged in clinical trials for all biologic drugs approved for atopic dermatitis (AD). However, real-world comparative data on the incidence, risk factors, and management of conjunctivitis remain limited.
objectiveWe aimed to compare the incidence, clinical features, and management of conjunctivitis in patients with moderate-to-severe AD treated with dupilumab or tralokinumab in a real-life setting. PATIENTS AND
methodsA multicenter, retrospective, observational study including adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD treated with dupilumab or tralokinumab for at least 16 weeks was carried out. Demographic, clinical, and therapeutic data were collected from 35 dermatological referral centers across Italy. Conjunctivitis incidence, severity, time to onset, and ophthalmologic management were analyzed and compared between treatment groups.
resultsA total of 6668 patients were included (5899 on dupilumab and 769 on tralokinumab). Conjunctivitis occurred in 10.76% of dupilumab-treated and 12.61% of tralokinumab-treated patients, with no statistically significant difference in overall incidence. However, time to onset was significantly shorter with tralokinumab than with dupilumab (15.3 ± 14.5 weeks vs. 35.5 ± 45.2 weeks, respectively; p < 0.0001). Ophthalmologic management strategies were similar between groups, mainly involving lubricants and corticosteroid-based eye drops. Dupilumab-treated patients more frequently discontinued or switched treatment due to conjunctivitis than tralokinumab patients (25.4% vs. 14.4%, respectively; p < 0.05).
conclusionsConjunctivitis represents a relatively frequent AE in patients with AD receiving dupilumab or tralokinumab. However, earlier onset of conjunctivitis with tralokinumab and higher discontinuation rates with dupilumab suggest differing tolerability profiles. Early recognition of ocular symptoms is essential, and dermatologists should promptly initiate supportive eye care and refer to ophthalmologists when appropriate to avoid unnecessary treatment interruptions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.