Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40836371›Full record

ArticleVeterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association2025

Optimizing Student Outcomes: A Comparison of Two Teaching Methods for Identifying Vegetal Foreign Bodies in Canine Limbs Using Simulation Models and Ultrasound.

Alexandra Williams, Ebony Schoenfeld, Esther Callcott, Randi Rotne

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Optimizing Student Outcomes: A Comparison of Two Teaching Methods for Identifying Vegetal Foreign Bodies in Canine Limbs Using Simulation Models and Ultrasound.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexandra WilliamsSchool of Agriculture, Environmental and Veterinary Science, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.
Ebony SchoenfeldSchool of Agriculture, Environmental and Veterinary Science, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.
Esther CallcottSchool of Agriculture, Environmental and Veterinary Science, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.
Randi RotneSchool of Agriculture, Environmental and Veterinary Science, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Musculoskeletal ultrasonography is an underutilized skill within the veterinary industry. It requires practice and repetition to improve confidence and competence. In a clinic, ultrasonography is often used to identify grass seeds in patients; however, its teaching within the veterinary curriculum is limited. This study investigated the use of simulation models using two different teaching methods to improve undergraduate student outcomes in identifying vegetal foreign bodies (VFB). Forelimb models, containing wild oaten grass seeds (Avena fatua) in one of three locations, were used as ultrasonographic teaching aids. Fourth-year undergraduate veterinary science students (n = 38) were randomly assigned a limb and taught an ultrasound protocol. The trial group (n = 19) received video instructions with a demonstration, whilst the control group (n = 19) received written instructions only. All participants completed a pre- and post- participation survey and were anonymously assessed on their ability to locate the grass seed. Participants provided with both the video and written instructions (trial group) were 1.92 times more likely to identify the VFB within the simulation model when compared with the control group, with 53% identifying the VFB (p = .0327). All students agreed they would consider using ultrasonography in the future to identify canine VFBs. The outcomes of this study suggest that the use of simulation models in teaching is beneficial and that visual and verbal communication significantly improved students' ability to identify VFB compared with written instruction alone in a consequence-free learning environment.

Indexed as

Education, VeterinaryForeign BodiesForelimbAnimalsClinical CompetenceDogsHumansSimulation TrainingUltrasonographycanine interdigital vegetal foreign bodysilicone modelssimulation‐based teachingsimulation‐based veterinary educationultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID40836371
PMCPMC12368255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.