Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40836354›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Validating adverse events in administrative healthcare data in ireland: a retrospective chart review study.

Anna Connolly, Maria Unbeck, Fiachra Bane, Kasia Bail, Margaret Craig, Anne Matthews, Anthony Staines, Marcia Kirwan

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anna ConnollySchool of Nursing, Psychotherapy and Community Health, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland. anna.connolly82@mail.dcu.ie.
Maria UnbeckSchool of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.
Fiachra BaneHealthcare Pricing Office, Health Service Executive, Dublin, Ireland.
Kasia BailCentre for Ageing Research and Translation, University of Canberra, and Synergy Nursing and Midwifery Research Centre ACT Health Directorate, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.
Margaret CraigSchool of Nursing, Psychotherapy and Community Health, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
Anne MatthewsSchool of Nursing, Psychotherapy and Community Health, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
Anthony StainesSchool of Nursing, Psychotherapy and Community Health, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
Marcia KirwanSchool of Nursing, Psychotherapy and Community Health, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

Health Research Board ILP-HSR-2022-009 grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPneumonia, urinary tract infections, pressure ulcers and delirium are adverse events that affect older inpatients. Accurate administrative data are key to improving patient safety and healthcare quality. The aim of the study was to validate Hospital In-Patient Enquiry (HIPE) data on the occurrence of pneumonia, urinary tract infections, pressure ulcers and delirium in older patients discharged from an acute hospital in Ireland through retrospective chart review.

methodsA cohort of one thousand randomly selected admissions of inpatients aged over 65 from a university, tertiary hospital in 2022 were reviewed using a two-stage retrospective chart review. The researchers, healthcare professionals and patient representatives co-produced a study-specific chart review protocol and data collection instrument. HIPE data were validated by comparing the chart review data to the HIPE data. Since HIPE only codes the presence of the respective adverse event once, the comparisons between the HIPE data and the chart review data were carried out at admission level.

resultsOf the 1,000 admissions reviewed, 231 (23.1%) contained at least one adverse event. At event level, 373 adverse events were identified including 133 pressure ulcers in 71 admissions, 101 delirium episodes in 100 admissions, 84 pneumonia episodes in 79 admissions and 55 urinary tract infections in 52 admissions. Of the 302 adverse events found in chart review on admission level, 96 (31.8%) of these were coded in the HIPE data and flagged by the Hospital Acquired Diagnosis indicator. Compared with chart review data, the overall sensitivity of the administrative data was low, and the specificity was high. The positive predictive values varied, and the negative predictive values were generally high. In HIPE data, 42 adverse events were found that were not identified in the chart review.

conclusionsThe results demonstrate that HIPE data may not accurately represent these specific adverse events as experienced by older patients. Improving the accuracy of these data may facilitate benchmarking of adverse events across hospitals and countries and provide opportunities for improvements in patient safety.

Indexed as

DeliriumPneumoniaPressure UlcerUrinary Tract InfectionsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIrelandMaleRetrospective StudiesAdverse eventChart reviewHealth administrative dataNursingNursing-sensitive patient outcomesPatient safetyRisk managementValidation study

Identifiers

PMID40836354
PMCPMC12369203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.