ArticleBMC health services research2025
Analysis of the causes of improper medical decision-making in medical damage liability disputes in China: a text mining approach.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Medico-legal patterns of cosmetic malpractice: a comparative analysis of complaints and judicial outcomes between licensed and unlicensed providers in Shiraz, Iran.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- The impact of national comprehensive medical reform on healthcare quality: evidence from China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Risk Factors and Liability Distribution in Medical Disputes Related to Spinal Diseases: A Six-Year Retrospective Study in Beijing.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- The social justice dilemma of liability allocation in medical damage: a qualitative analysis based on case judgments.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImproper medical decision-making is a key issue in healthcare disputes worldwide. In China, medical malpractice lawsuits related to improper decision-making are on the rise, but research on the patterns and underlying factors of such litigation is limited. This study aims to analyze the characteristics and patterns of medical decision-making malpractice cases in China, with the goal of providing reference points for judicial processes and offering policy recommendations to prevent and mitigate doctor-patient conflicts.
methodsThis study selected medical damage liability dispute cases from the China Judgments Online platform between 2018 and 2024. Python was used for data cleaning, Chinese word segmentation, and stop-word filtering. A total of 439 cases involving improper medical decision-making were included for analysis. A Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic model was applied to identify major themes, and differential analysis was conducted to explore the relationships among hospital level, identification method, damage outcomes, and degree of responsibility.
resultsIn medical decision-making lawsuit cases, judicial identification requests were predominant, and patient death was more likely to trigger litigation. The medical parties often bore secondary responsibility. Statistically significant differences were found between hospital level and degree of responsibility (P = 0.034 < 0.05) and between hospital level and damage outcomes (P = 0.008 < 0.01). The LDA topic model revealed six main themes in the cases: medical behavior, evidence analysis, damage compensation, treatment effectiveness, patient rights, and legal applicability. Cluster analysis identified the main causes of improper decision-making, including insufficient informed consent, improper treatment plans, inadequate examinations, poor monitoring of conditions, insufficient consultations, incorrect diagnoses, improper medication, insufficient assessment, and lack of thorough patient history inquiry.
conclusionsImproper medical decision-making is closely related to the responsibility awareness and communication skills of healthcare providers. Insufficient informed consent and improper treatment plans are the primary causes of improper medical decision-making. Effective communication between doctors and patients is a common problem across hospitals at all levels. To reduce improper medical decision-making, the following measures are recommended: emphasizing informed consent to reduce decision-making risk, strengthening team collaboration to improve decision-making ability, conducting thorough examinations to reduce uncertainty, developing individualized treatment plans, and promoting clinical decision support systems to avoid information omission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.