Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40836326›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Methods for studying health disparities in U.S. nursing homes: a scoping review.

Hanne Marie Rostad, Lucille Xiang, Elizabeth M White

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hanne Marie RostadCenter for Care Research East, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Gjøvik, Norway. hanne.m.rostad@ntnu.no.
Lucille XiangCenter for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, USA.
Elizabeth M WhiteCenter for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth disparities exist across healthcare settings, including nursing homes, contributing to preventable differences in care quality. Health disparities are a global issue, yet most studies on nursing home health disparities have been conducted in the United States. In this scoping review, our objective was to synthesize methods used in U.S. nursing home disparities research to gain insights to inform similar research in other countries. Specifically, we summarized different approaches for conceptualizing and measuring health disparities, available data sources, study designs, and analytic strategies.

methodsWe employed two parallel search strategies across five databases, targeting specific aspects of health disparities and broader concepts. Study selection was conducted independently by two reviewers. Using a numerical and analytic approach, we categorized and summarized the results.

resultsThe search yielded 6,817 records, with 82 unique studies meeting the inclusion criteria. All studies used quantitative methods, with only two incorporating mixed methods. Most were observational cross-sectional studies (n = 60), while 21 were longitudinal studies, and 1 was a randomized controlled trial. Most studies used administrative data (n = 62). The majority (n = 65) measured differences in health outcomes across nursing homes. A significant number of studies (n = 71) focused on racial and/or ethnic health disparities, and a few studied clinical conditions (n = 7), rural–urban location of the nursing home (n = 4), socioeconomic factors (n = 4), age (n = 1), and sex (n = 1) as characteristics to measure disparity. Outcomes were grouped into five domains: 1) Quality of care measures (n = 54), 2) Infection and infection prevention (n = 22), 3) Transitions and acute care utilization (n = 19), 4) Behavioral and mental health (n = 18), and 5) Palliative care, end-of-life and death (n = 13). Across the five domains, the most prevalent outcome category studied was ‘Hospitalization and emergency room use’ (n = 15).

conclusionThis review highlights key issues for future research on health disparities in nursing homes, including the need to: 1) clarify concepts of health disparities and health equity; 2) move beyond mere descriptions of disparities to identify underlying factors contributing to those disparities; 3) broaden examination of disparities beyond a single axis such as race or sex; 4) integrate more qualitative data to capture nuances that cannot be measured from quantitative data; and 5) specify whether within or across nursing home differences are studied.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth Status DisparitiesNursing HomesHumansNursing Home ResidentsUnited StatesHealth disparitiesHealth equityLong-term careNursing homesReview

Identifiers

PMID40836326
PMCPMC12369220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.