ArticleBMC health services research2025
Methods for studying health disparities in U.S. nursing homes: a scoping review.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealth disparities exist across healthcare settings, including nursing homes, contributing to preventable differences in care quality. Health disparities are a global issue, yet most studies on nursing home health disparities have been conducted in the United States. In this scoping review, our objective was to synthesize methods used in U.S. nursing home disparities research to gain insights to inform similar research in other countries. Specifically, we summarized different approaches for conceptualizing and measuring health disparities, available data sources, study designs, and analytic strategies.
methodsWe employed two parallel search strategies across five databases, targeting specific aspects of health disparities and broader concepts. Study selection was conducted independently by two reviewers. Using a numerical and analytic approach, we categorized and summarized the results.
resultsThe search yielded 6,817 records, with 82 unique studies meeting the inclusion criteria. All studies used quantitative methods, with only two incorporating mixed methods. Most were observational cross-sectional studies (n = 60), while 21 were longitudinal studies, and 1 was a randomized controlled trial. Most studies used administrative data (n = 62). The majority (n = 65) measured differences in health outcomes across nursing homes. A significant number of studies (n = 71) focused on racial and/or ethnic health disparities, and a few studied clinical conditions (n = 7), rural–urban location of the nursing home (n = 4), socioeconomic factors (n = 4), age (n = 1), and sex (n = 1) as characteristics to measure disparity. Outcomes were grouped into five domains: 1) Quality of care measures (n = 54), 2) Infection and infection prevention (n = 22), 3) Transitions and acute care utilization (n = 19), 4) Behavioral and mental health (n = 18), and 5) Palliative care, end-of-life and death (n = 13). Across the five domains, the most prevalent outcome category studied was ‘Hospitalization and emergency room use’ (n = 15).
conclusionThis review highlights key issues for future research on health disparities in nursing homes, including the need to: 1) clarify concepts of health disparities and health equity; 2) move beyond mere descriptions of disparities to identify underlying factors contributing to those disparities; 3) broaden examination of disparities beyond a single axis such as race or sex; 4) integrate more qualitative data to capture nuances that cannot be measured from quantitative data; and 5) specify whether within or across nursing home differences are studied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.