ArticleBMC psychology2025
The experience of social isolation in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Social Isolation and Loneliness in People Living With Chronic Kidney Disease and Kidney Failure: A Mixed Method Systematic Review.Journal of renal care · 2026Pooled it
- Frailty in peritoneal dialysis patients: a scoping review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Investigation of Social Constraints, Psychosocial Adjustment and Optimism among Dialysis Patients.Clinics and practice · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSocial isolation(SI), as a negative psychological state, can aggravate sleep disturbances and deterioration of renal function, seriously jeopardizing physical health, which is particularly prominent in peritoneal dialysis(PD) patients. However, most of the current research in this field is quantitative, and there are few qualitative studies on SI in PD patients. Understanding patients’ psychological experience of SI is essential for the targeted design of intervention programs. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the experience of SI among PD patients.
methods12 peritoneal dialysis patients who were hospitalized in a tertiary hospital in Zhengzhou City, Henan Province, were selected for the study using purposive sampling. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted to collect data, and content analysis methods were used to analyze the data.
resultsA total of 4 themes and 16 sub-themes were analyzed and extracted from this study, namely: (1) Objective manifestations of social isolation(Work isolation, Entertainment isolation, International isolation, Self isolation); (2) Subjective emotional feelings of social isolation. (Low self-esteem and sensitivity, Fear and concern, Solitude and loneliness, Dissembling and deception); (3) Multiple obstacles exacerbate the plight of social isolation(Shackles of over protection, Lack of self-worth, Agony of public misunderstanding, Burden of treatment expenditure, Limitation of treatment conditions); (4) Patients still crave multiple forms of social support(Appreciate Family support, Value Peer Support, Call for social support).
conclusionThis study provides insight into the experience of SI in PD patients and the reasons for it. SI in PD patients can manifest as Objective manifestations and Subjective emotional feelings that create significant psychological problems. The degree of SI is aggravated by multiple factors such as lack of self-worth and lack of public awareness. In the future, it is necessary to provide support to improve the SI problem through the collaboration of multiple fields such as family, peers and society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.