ArticleBMC medical research methodology2025
A multistate transition model for survival estimation in randomized trials with treatment switching and a cured subgroup.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although many methods have been proposed on the overall survival estimation in randomized trials permitting treatment switching after the progressive disease (PD), the cured subgroup of patients within these trials has not been fully considered. These cured patients would never experience PD and subsequent risk of treatment switching, yet they may suffer death hazard similar to those without the disease. Due to the mix of the cured subgroup, existing methods may yield biased effect estimation for the uncured patients between treatment groups. To address this limitation, we propose a multistate transition model that integrates multi-states of the cure, PD, treatment switching, and death during trials. In this model, the cure probability for all the patients and the death hazard of the cured subgroup are modeled separately. Meanwhile, the semi-competing risks model is used for the treatment effect evaluation on the uncured patients through transitional hazards between states of PD, treatment switching, and death. The particle swarm optimization algorithm is employed to estimate the model parameters. Extensive simulation studies have been conducted to assess the performance of the proposed multistate model in comparison with existing treatment switching adjustment methods. The results show that the treatment effect estimations of our proposed model are more accurate across all scenarios. Moreover, the illustration based on a simulated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma trial demonstrates the applicability and advantages of the proposed model. The robustness of the proposed multistate transition model enables it to accurately estimate the treatment effect in trials that involve a cured subgroup and the treatment switching after PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.