Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40836202›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2025

Motor imagery-based neural networks for assisting tetraplegic patients.

Prabhakar Agarwal, Sandeep Kumar, Rishav Singh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Prabhakar AgarwalGalgotias University, Greater Noida, India.
Sandeep KumarNational Institute of Technology Delhi, Delhi, India. sandeep@nitdelhi.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9922-2663
Rishav SinghIndian Institute of Technology Patna, Patna, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, deep network-based classification algorithms are used in a myriad of applications for brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). These interfaces can enhance the daily lives of quadriplegic patients. Electroencephalography (EEG) based motor imagery (MI) is an integral part of BCI, and the performance of the available deep classifiers is still limited. This paper presents a novel convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture designed to enhance the multiclass classification accuracy of motor imagery (MI) signals acquired through EEG-based sensing. We have selected the electrodes over the sensorimotor cortex region of the brain in the 8-30 Hz EEG frequency band. Further, we have computed the classification accuracy and kappa scores in an end-to-end deep classification network. Our framework surpasses the contemporary literature algorithms in classifying BCI competition IV-2a, a four-class MI dataset of nine subjects (left hand, right hand, both feet, tongue). The proposed network architecture has achieved an average and maximum accuracy of 95.19% and 99.28%, respectively. We have outperformed state-of-the-art accuracies of the individual subjects S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S8, and the average accuracy of the dataset by 8.28%, 40.97%, 5.54%, 14.83%, 19.09%, 25.5%, 10.43%, and 12.82% respectively.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesImaginationNeural Networks, ComputerQuadriplegiaAdultAlgorithmsElectroencephalographyHumansMaleSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedBrain-computer interfaceConvolutional neural networkElectroencephalographyMotor imagery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.