SynthesisEye (London, England)2025
Efficacy of faricimab secondary to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A real-world study of Faricimab: efficacy and biomarkers in treatment-experienced neovascular age-related macular degeneration(nAMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME) patients.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Real-world outcomes after switching to faricimab in previously treated neovascular age-related macular degeneration: longitudinal outcomes up to 24 months.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines the efficacy and safety of faricimab as a secondary treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) patients previously treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGF) agents. A literature search was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library up to 24 October 2024. Cohort and observational studies reporting functional and anatomical outcomes in nAMD patients switched to faricimab were included. Meta analysis with common and random-effect model was performed using "metagen" package in R version 3.2.1. 446 studies were identified on our preliminary search, of which 20 studies (1007 eyes) with a baseline central macular thickness (CMT) of 342.07 ( ± 110.14) um were included in the final analysis. Switching to faricimab led to significant reductions in CMT at 3 months (Mean difference = -47.08 um, 95% Confidence Interval (CI)= (-66.01, -28.15), p = 0.009) and 6 months post-switch (Mean difference =-44.68 um, 95% CI= (-67.17, -22.20), p = 0.002). Pigment epithelium detachment (PED) height was also reduced at 3 months (Mean difference = -31.71um, 95% CI= (-45.12, -18.30), p = 0.036) and 6 months post-switch (Mean difference = -34.85 um, 95% CI= (-50.19, -19.51), p = 0.011). However, no significant improvements in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were observed at 3 months (p = 0.407), 6 months (p = 0.920) or ≥12 months (p = 0.261) post-switch. Treatment intervals were significantly extended (Mean difference=1.87 weeks, 95% CI = (0.41, 33.3), p = 0.019), with a low incidence of serious adverse events. In conclusion, faricimab demonstrates favorable structural benefits, stable functional outcomes and extended treatment intervals as a second-line treatment for nAMD in patients with prior anti-VEGF therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.