ArticleNature2025
Electron flow matching for generative reaction mechanism prediction.
Article in Nature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing biocatalytic retrosynthesis with a graph-to-graph model.Chemical science · 2026Article
- Flow matching for reaction pathway generation.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Reaction Enumeration Based on NBO-Informed Molecular Graphs.Journal of computational chemistry · 2026Article
- Organic Chemistry as a Catalyst for AI Innovation: Challenges, Methods, and Emerging Paradigms.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Generalized Analysis of Electrophilic Small Molecules.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
- Mechanism-informed rules tunably balance novelty and feasibility of predicted enzymatic reactions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- SynRXN: An Open Benchmark and Curated Dataset for Computational Reaction Modeling.Scientific data · 2026Article
- NMR-Solver: automated structure elucidation via large-scale spectral matching and physics-guided fragment optimization.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Mechanism-Aware Deep Learning for Polar Reaction Prediction.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Central to our understanding of chemical reactivity is the principle of mass conservation
Identifiers
40836082What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.