Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40836059›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Automatic detection of cognitive events using machine learning and understanding models' interpretations of human cognition.

Quang Dang, Murat Kucukosmanoglu, Michael Anoruo, Golshan Kargosha, Sarah Conklin, Justin Brooks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Quang DangDepartment of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, 21250, USA. qdang1@umbc.edu.
Murat KucukosmanogluD-Prime LLC, McLean, VA, 22101, USA.
Michael AnoruoDepartment of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, 21250, USA.
Golshan KargoshaD-Prime LLC, McLean, VA, 22101, USA.
Sarah ConklinCenter for Women's Biobehavioral Health Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219, USA.
Justin BrooksDepartment of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, 21250, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pupillary response is a valuable indicator of cognitive workload, capturing fluctuations in attention and arousal governed by the autonomic nervous system. Cognitive events, defined as the initiation of mental processes, are closely linked to cognitive workload as they trigger cognitive responses. In this study, we detect cognitive events for the task-evoked pupillary response across four domains (vigilance, emotion processing, numerical reasoning, and short-term memory). The problem is framed as a binary classification. We train one generalized model and four task-specific models on 1-s pupil diameter and gaze position segments. Five models achieve MCC between 0.43 and 0.75. We report three key findings: (1) the generalized model reduces the specificity to enhance the sensitivity, illustrating the trade-off from specialization to generalization; (2) the permutation feature importance analyses show that both pupil dilation and gaze position contribute to model predictions, with task-specific models focusing on task-specific structure patterns to predict while the generalized model is using human cognitive responses; and (3) in an online simulation environment, models performance decreases by approximately 0.05 on MCC. The findings highlight the potential of machine learning applied to pupillary signals for rapid, individualized detection of cognitive events.

Indexed as

CognitionMachine LearningAdultArousalAttentionEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermPupilYoung AdultCognitive classificationCognitive events detectionDeep learningExplainable AIFeature importanceMachine learningNeural networks

Identifiers

PMID40836059
PMCPMC12368119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.