SynthesisPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2026
Systematic review of outcomes reported in clinical research on nephronophthisis: how do they align with SONG Kids priorities?
Synthesis in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNephronophthisis (NPH) is a rare hereditary cystic kidney disease, characterized by a highly variable clinical and genetic presentation, accounting for up to 10% of kidney failure in children. Despite advances in understanding its molecular basis and phenotypic spectrum, no causative therapies exist, and clinical trials remain absent. To support future treatment development, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) tailored to NPH should be defined to prioritize outcomes meaningful to patients and families.
objectivesThis study aimed to analyze the use of clinical data, surrogate parameters, and patient-reported outcomes in NPH research to date, with a focus on the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology (SONG) project outcomes validated for children with chronic kidney disease (SONG Kids). DATA SOURCES: A systematic search of the MEDLINE database was conducted for NPH studies. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies published after 1988, written in English, reporting at least one human clinical outcome, with a sample size of n ≥ 4, and using original data were considered eligible.
resultsA total of 1066 records were retrieved through the search, of which 821 full-text reports were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 90 studies met eligibility criteria and were included in the review. While 100% of the studies reported clinical outcomes and 85% included surrogate parameter, only 41% examined patient-reported outcomes. Overlap between the SONG Kids outcome set and the outcomes identified in this study was moderate. Only 20 studies reported more than one SONG core outcome, while 24% and 66% of studies reported at least one middle tier or outer tier outcome, respectively. None of these studies used instruments validated for NPH. LIMITATIONS: The majority of studies focused primarily on molecular and genetic aspects, with clinical outcomes addressed only as a secondary consideration. The review incorporated only one prospective study, while the remaining studies were retrospective in nature. Differentiation between outcomes reported by children and those reported by parents was not possible in the included studies; this important distinction must be taken into account in the development of future PROMs for NPH. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY
findingsStudies in NPH addressed both clinical outcomes and surrogate parameters, but there is a notable absence of measures related to life participation and patient-reported outcomes. Disease group-specific instruments fall short in adequately reflecting the symptoms of individual diseases, emphasizing the necessity for the development of disease-specific PROMs for NPH. Open Science Framework (OSF) registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/658BR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.