Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40836029›Full record

ArticleMolecular psychiatry2026

De novo protein-coding gene variants in developmental stuttering.

Else Eising, Ivana Dzinovic, Arianna Vino, Lottie Stipdonk, Martin Pavlov, Juliane Winkelmann, Martin Sommer, Marie-Christine J P Franken, Konrad Oexle, Simon E Fisher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Developmental stuttering with common and complex phenotypes.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2026
    Article
  2. Childhood motor speech disorders: who to prioritise for genetic testing.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026
    Article
  3. Unraveling Stuttering Through a Multi-Omics Lens.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Else EisingLanguage and Genetics Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 6525, XD, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Else.Eising@mpi.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-9819-1260
Ivana DzinovicInstitute of Human Genetics, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0009-0003-1340-5437
Arianna VinoLanguage and Genetics Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 6525, XD, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Lottie StipdonkDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015, GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Martin PavlovInstitute of Human Genetics, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Juliane WinkelmannInstitute of Human Genetics, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3074-599X
Martin SommerDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2534-2480
Marie-Christine J P FrankenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015, GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Konrad Oexle *Institute of Human Genetics, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7447-2252
Simon E Fisher *Language and Genetics Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 6525, XD, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3132-1996

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research) VI.Veni.202.072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developmental stuttering is a common childhood condition characterized by disfluencies in speech, such as blocks, prolongations, and repetitions. While most children who stutter do so only transiently, there are some for whom stuttering persists into adulthood. Rare-variant screens in families including multiple relatives with persistent stuttering have so far identified six genes carrying putative pathogenic variants hypothesized to act in a monogenic fashion. Here, we applied a complementary study design, searching instead for de novo variants in exomes of 85 independent parent-child trios, each with a child with transient or persistent stuttering. Exome sequencing analysis yielded a pathogenic variant in SPTBN1 as well as likely pathogenic variants in PRPF8, TRIO, and ZBTB7A - four genes previously implicated in neurodevelopmental disorders with or without speech problems. Our results also highlighted two further genes of interest for stuttering: FLT3 and IREB2. We used extensive bioinformatic approaches to investigate overlaps in brain-related processes among the twelve genes associated with monogenic forms of stuttering. Analyses of gene-expression datasets of the developing and adult human brain, and data from a genome-wide association study of human brain structural connectivity, did not find links of monogenic stuttering to specific brain processes. Overall, our results provide the first direct genetic link between stuttering and other neurodevelopmental disorders, including speech delay and aphasia. In addition, we systematically demonstrate a dissimilarity in biological pathways associated with the genes thus far implicated in monogenic forms of stuttering, indicating heterogeneity in the etiological basis of this condition.

Indexed as

StutteringAdolescentAdultBrainChildDNA-Binding ProteinsExomeExome SequencingFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic VariationGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMaleNeurodevelopmental DisordersTranscription FactorsDNA-Binding ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID40836029
PMCPMC12700790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.