ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning aided optoelectric characterization modelling and prediction of the IV parameters of perovskite solar cells with > 90% accuracy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Luminescence imaging techniques assume a critical role in the evaluation of the durability and lifespan of solar cells. This study presents a novel empirical approach that capitalizes on simple machine learning-based linear regression (MLLR) to prognosticate the performance of perovskite solar cells (PSCs). Three types of MLLR models were developed: (a) Full width at Half maximum (FWHM)-based MLLR Model, (b) Colour Correlated Temperature (CCT)-based MLLR Model, and (c) Hybrid or FWHM-CCT-based MLLR Model. The proposed FWHM-based MLLR model achieves the best overall performance in fitting all current-voltage (IV) parameters. The CCT-based model, while applicable to all parameters, exhibits slightly lower accuracy compared to the FWHM-based approach; however, considering standalone analysis, CCT-based MLLR model is the best fit for estimation of Voc and FF parameters. This prognostication hinges on quantitatively assessing the FWHM using electroluminescence (EL) spectroscopy data. Notably, this investigation stands out by showcasing the potential of simple yet supervised machine learning in appraising IV characteristics of PSC through EL spectroscopy. Remarkably, the study attains an average predictive accuracy of beyond 90% for IV characteristics via EL spectroscopy facilitated by a supervised machine-learning model using both continuous and discontinuous datasets. The findings of this research underscore the potential of supervised machine learning as an innovative technique for approximating IV curve parameters of PSC, utilizing EL spectroscopy. This advancement holds significant ramifications for fortifying the assessment of PSCs in terms of reliability analysis and manufacturing efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.