ArticleScientific reports2025
An effective flowchart for multimodal brain tumor binary classification with ranked 3D texture features.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain tumors have complex structures, and their shape, density, and size can vary widely. Consequently, their accurate classification, which involves identifying features that best describe the tumor data, is challenging. Using classical 2D texture features can yield only limited accuracy. Here, we show that this limitation can be overcome by using 3D feature extraction and ranking methods. Brain tumor images obtained through 3D magnetic resonance imaging were used to classify high-grade and low-grade glioma in the BraTS 2017 dataset. From the dataset, texture properties for each of the four phases (i.e., FLAIR, T1, T1c, and T2) were extracted using a 3D gray level co-occurrence matrix. Various combinations of brain tumor feature sets were created, and feature ranking methods-Bhattacharyya, entropy, receiver operating characteristic, the t-test, and the Wilcoxon test-were applied to them. Features were classified using gradient boosting, support vector machines (SVMs), and random forest methods. The performance of all combinations was evaluated from the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, precision, and F-score obtained from twofold, fivefold, and tenfold cross-validation tests. In all experiments, the most effective scheme was that involving the quadruple combination (FLAIR + T1 + T1c + T2) and the entropy feature-ranking method with twofold cross-validation. Notably, the proposed machine-learning-based framework showed remarkable scores of 100% (sensitivity), 97.29% (specificity), 99.30% (accuracy), 99.07% (precision), and 99.53% (F-score) for glioma classification with an SVM. The proposed flowchart reflects a novel brain tumor classification system that competes with the novel methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.