Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40835976›Full record

ArticleOecologia2025

Does within-biome drought sensitivity reflect patterns across biomes?

Sydney L Hedberg, Phuong D Dao, Alan K Knapp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sydney L HedbergDepartment of Biology and Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. Sydney.Hedberg24@alumni.colostate.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-7822-5552
Phuong D DaoDepartment of Agricultural Biology and Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Alan K KnappDepartment of Biology and Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2022-67019-36367National Science Foundation Konza Prairie Long Term Ecological Research DEB-2025849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Droughts are expected to increase in severity and frequency with climate change, and it is important to understand why some ecosystems are more sensitive to drought than others. Currently, there is considerable evidence that ecosystem sensitivity to drought, quantified by reductions in aboveground net primary production (ANPP), is negatively related to mean annual precipitation (MAP). Thus, arid ecosystems are more likely than mesic systems to experience dramatic reductions in productivity during drought. However, evidence for this pattern is primarily from studies that span multiple biomes making it difficult to discern if abiotic (MAP) or biotic factors (differences in plant communities) underlie this relationship. To disentangle these, we assessed patterns of drought sensitivity within a single biome, the semiarid shortgrass steppe of the western U.S., where the dominant vegetation varies minimally compared to cross-biomes studies. We used 23 years of satellite derived ANPP proxies, the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI, 157,929 pixels, 1 km

Indexed as

DroughtsEcosystemClimate ChangeClimate changeDroughtGrasslandPrecipitationProductivitySteppe

Identifiers

PMID40835976
PMCPMC12367911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.