Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40835959›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2025

A simple guide to the use of Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-squared test, and Kruskal-Wallis test in biostatistics.

Davide Chicco, Andrea Sichenze, Giuseppe Jurman

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07607301 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Genomics & Science DOJO 3.0 Learning Method in Improving Research Skills and Scientific Writing Among Researchers in Indonesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSummit Institute for Development, IndonesiaRan2026 to 2027Enrolled96ConditionsWorkshop, Critical Thinking Skill, Data Analysis Skill, Personal EmpowermentArmsGenomics & Science Dojo Learning Methodology, Standard Learning Methodology
NCT07757620 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Epigenetic Changes in Long COVID Patients: Unraveling the Gut-Immune Axis and Therapeutic Targets

TypeobservationalSponsorIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpARan2026 to 2027Enrolled1,000ConditionsLong COVID-19 Syndrome, Long COVID Symptoms
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Health related quality of life of patients with breast cancer in Malaysia: evidence from EQ-5D-5L and EORTC QLQ-C30.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Evaluating the efficacy and readability of advanced large language models in responding to patients' frequently asked questions about chronic rhinosinusitis: a comparative analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Davide ChiccoUniversità di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy. davide.chicco@unimib.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9655-7142
Andrea SichenzeUniversità di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-5896-5697
Giuseppe JurmanHumanitas University, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2705-5728

Funding

Italian Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca ReGAInSItalian Ministero Italiano delle Imprese e del Made in Italy DIPPS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an age when machine learning and artificial intelligence are broadly employed, traditional statistics can still provide insightful information and results quickly and at a low computational cost. Statistics, in fact, offers many useful tools to researchers, including a series of univariate statistical tests that can identify relationships between pairs of numeric samples: Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-squared test, and Kruskal-Wallis test. These tests generate several outcomes, including probability values (p-values) that can express a numerical quantity which accepts or rejects the null hypothesis, based on a certain threshold used. Although effective, these tests are often misused or employed in the wrong contexts, especially among biostatistics studies. Many scientific researchers do not seem to know how to choose one test over the others, and this misuse can lead to incorrect results and wrong conclusions. Here we present a simple theoretical and practical guide to the use of these four tests, first describing their theoretical properties and then displaying the results obtained by applying these tests to real-world medical datasets. Eventually, we explain when and how to use each test based on the data types of the samples considered. Our study can have a strong impact on scientific research by potentially influencing future studies involving these tests. Our recommendations, in turn, can help researchers produce more reliable and sound scientific results, thus increasing the quality of multiple scientific studies across various fields.

Indexed as

BiostatisticsChi-squared testKruskal-Wallis testMann-Whitney U testStatistical significanceStudent’s t-testUnivariate statistical tests

Identifiers

PMID40835959
PMCPMC12366075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.