ArticleJournal of ovarian research2025
Patient-derived organoids as a model to study tubo-ovarian carcinoma: a pathologist's perspective.
Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Organoids and AI-integrated models in ovarian cancer research: the future of personalized therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTubo-ovarian carcinoma, a leading cause of gynaecological-related mortality, holds substantial biological and clinical heterogeneity. Despite advancements in drug development, predicting therapeutic efficacy remains challenging, partly due to the limited availability of in vitro models that accurately replicate tumour behaviour. We present a concise overview of the intrahospital workflow for establishing patient-derived organoids and analyse the morphological and immunophenotypical features of high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), serous borderline tumour (SBT)/low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC), and normal fallopian tube (FT) organoids.
resultsSamples were collected from patients undergoing surgery or paracentesis. Tissue underwent mechanical and enzymatical digestion. Resulting cell suspensions were resuspended in an extracellular matrix substitute for subsequent culture. Despite the low efficacy in establishing HGSC organoids (n = 1/7, 14%; 96 days, 11 passages), we successfully established two organoid lines of SBT/LGSC (n = 2/2, 100%; 65 days, 7 passages; 134 days, 16 passages) and normal FT (n = 2/2, 100%; 73 days, 10 passages; 58 days, 8 passages). HGSC organoids exhibited limited growth and mostly irregular structures, while preserving the p53 immunostaining pattern of the original tumour. SBT/LGSC and FT organoids maintained features of architectural complexity and faithfully recapitulated the original immunoprofile.
conclusionsThis study highlights the need for a multidisciplinary collaboration in both clinical and research settings to establish patient-derived organoids. It emphasises the pivotal contribution of pathologists in meticulous sampling and organoid characterisation. The integration of diverse expertise is essential for maximising the potential of organoids as preclinical tools, advancing our understanding of tubo-ovarian carcinoma, and ultimately improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.