ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
Learning-based parallel acceleration for HaplotypeCaller.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genome-Wide Association Study and Genomic Selection for Average Daily Gain in Ashidan Yak.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the genome analysis workflow, Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) HaplotypeCaller is a widely used variant calling tool designed to accurately identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and insertions/deletions (Indels) in samples. However, when processing large-scale datasets, HaplotypeCaller often faces the challenge of excessively long runtime. Parallelizing GATK HaplotypeCaller with data segmentation is an effective solution, but existing methods struggle to accurately estimate the computational complexity of each data block, leading to severe computational skew. This paper introduces a learning-based framework LPA (learning-based parallel acceleration), leveraging model to accurately predict the computational complexity of data. By employing adaptive data segmentation algorithms and Multi-Knapsack Problem (MKP) based task scheduling, LPA significantly alleviates computational skew. We evaluated LPA in multiple datasets, demonstrating that its execution speed is 30x–40x faster than HaplotypeCaller and 2x–5x faster than HaplotypeCallerSpark. LPA achieves a speedup of 1.3x–2x compared to similar methods. And LPA maintaining a high accuracy with over 99.9%, enhancing the efficiency and reliability of variant calling. The source code of LPA is publicly available at https://github.com/laixx9/LPA .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.