Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2025
Driving pressure-guided dynamic PEEP titration reduces atelectasis and improves oxygenation in pediatric laparoscopy: a randomized trial on personalized ventilation strategies.
Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of driving pressure-guided individualized PEEP in children undergoing right lateral thoracotomy cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass on postoperative atelectasis and oxygenation: a randomized controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Trial
- EIT-guided end-expiratory pressure individualization in robotic surgery with high PEEP ventilation: a prospective observational study.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Effects of driving pressure-guided lung-protective ventilation strategy on respiratory mechanics, oxygenation, and postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy: a randomized clinical trial.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPediatric laparoscopic surgery often induces atelectasis due to pneumoperitoneum, postural changes, and immature respiratory physiology, increasing postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Fixed PEEP may fail to address perioperative variability. This study evaluated whether dynamic PEEP adjustment reduces atelectasis and improves oxygenation.
methodsChildren at moderate or high risk of PPCs undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery were randomized into two groups. Group A had driving pressure-guided individualized PEEP titration at three specified time points: after intubation, before pneumoperitoneum initiation, and after pneumoperitoneum completion. Group B had individualized PEEP titration only after intubation, with this PEEP maintained until the end of ventilation. Both groups received alveolar recruitment maneuvers (ARMs). Observations were conducted at 5 min after tracheal intubation (T1), 20 min post-pneumoperitoneum (T2), 60 min post-pneumoperitoneum (T3), at the end of surgery (T4), and at extubation (T5). The primary outcome were intraoperative lung ultrasound score. Secondary outcomes included incidence of atelectasis, oxygenation index, peak airway pressure, plateau pressure, PEEP, driving pressure, dynamic lung compliance, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate.
resultsAt T4 and T5, Group A showed significantly lower subpleural consolidation scores, total lung ultrasound scores, and atelectasis rates versus Group B (P < 0.05). Oxygenation indices in Group A were higher at T3–T5 (P < 0.05). Post-pneumoperitoneum, Group A’s median PEEP increased to 8 cmH2O (vs. Group B), with lower driving pressure and higher dynamic compliance (P < 0.05). Hemodynamic parameters showed no intergroup differences (P > 0.05).
conclusionDriving pressure-guided dynamic PEEP titration reduces postoperative lung ultrasound abnormalities and atelectasis while improving oxygenation and respiratory mechanics in pediatric laparoscopy, without compromising hemodynamic stability. This strategy supports personalized PEEP optimization.
trial registrationThis trial was registered on Clinical Trials.gov (Registration No. ChiCTR2300070193, Registration date: 2023-04-04). The trial was retrospectively registered as enrollment began prior to registration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.