ArticleScientific reports2025
Stacking ensemble learning models diagnose pulmonary infections using host transcriptome data from metatranscriptomics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The prompt diagnosis of pulmonary infections with unknown etiology in patients in severe condition remains a challenge due to the lack of rapid and effective diagnostic methods. While metatranscriptomic sequencing offers a powerful approach, its clinical utility is often limited by issues of timeliness. In this study, we conducted metatranscriptomic sequencing on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) collected from critically ill, severely ill, and ICU patients. Based on microbial detection results, patients were classified into four types: negative, bacterial infection, viral infection, and fungal infection. To identify host gene expression signatures associated with infection, we screened characteristic genes from human metatranscriptomic data by comparing 70% of patients with confirmed infections vs. non-infections. Leveraging these characteristic genes, we constructed classification sub-models employing 13 types of machine learning algorithms, and we further integrated these sub-models into stacking-based ensemble models with Lasso regression, resulting in diagnostic models that required only a small set of gene expression inputs. The average performance of five-fold cross-validation demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy: distinguishing infection from non-infection (AUC = 0.984), bacterial infection from non-bacterial infection (AUC = 0.98), and viral infection from non- viral infection (AUC = 0.98). Test cohorts' results demonstrated the method's high diagnostic accuracy consistency with metatranscriptomic sequencing in discerning patient infection status (AUC = 0.865) and the type of infection (viral: AUC = 0.934, bacterial: AUC = 0.871). Our study presented a rapid and inexpensive adjunctive diagnostic strategy that achieves diagnostic accuracy comparable to metatranscriptomic sequencing, enabling timely identification of both infection status and type in pulmonary infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.