Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40835889›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2025

Super-pangenome analyses across 35 accessions of 23 Avena species highlight their complex evolutionary history and extensive genomic diversity.

Hongyu Zhang, Ningkun Liu, Yaru Wang, Xinyuan Zheng, Wei Li, Ze Liu, Jianan Liu, Yu Wang, Longsheng Xing, Tao Li and 8 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Dynamic evolution and hierarchical regulation of rDNA in polyploid oat.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Hongyu Zhang *College of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Science and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, China.
Ningkun Liu *College of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Science and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, China.
Yaru Wang *College of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Science and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, China.
Xinyuan Zheng *College of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Science and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, China.
Wei Li *College of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Science and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6726-329X
Ze LiuCollege of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Science and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, China.
Jianan LiuCollege of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Science and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, China.
Yu WangCollege of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Science and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, China.
Longsheng XingCollege of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Science and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, China.
Tao LiCollege of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Science and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, China.
Yange YunCollege of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Science and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, China.
Qinghong ZhouCollege of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Science and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, China.
Meijia WangCollege of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Science and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-9647-8552
Yujie QinCollege of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Science and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, China.
Jinjiang YanCollege of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Science and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, China.
Zhizhong GongCollege of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Science and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, China. gongzz@cau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6551-6014
Qiang HeCollege of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Science and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, China. heqiang_cqnu@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6466-8339
Huilong DuCollege of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Science and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, China. huilongdu@hbu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7755-6611

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Common oat, belonging to the genus Avena with 30 recognized species, is a nutritionally important cereal crop and high-quality forage worldwide. Here, we construct a genus-level super-pangenome of Avena comprising 35 high-quality genomes from 14 cultivated oat accessions and 21 wild species. The fully resolved phylogenomic analysis unveils the origin and evolutionary scenario of Avena species, and the super-pangenome analysis identifies 26.62% and 59.93% specific genes and haplotypes in wild species. We delineate the landscape of structural variations (SVs) and the transcriptome profile based 1,401 RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) samples from diverse abiotic stress treatments in oat. We highlight the crucial role of SVs in modulating gene expression and shaping adaptation to diverse stresses. Further combining SV-based genome-wide association studies (GWASs), we characterize 13 candidate genes associated with drought resistance such as AsARF7, validated by transgenic oat lines. Our study provides unprecedented genomic resources to facilitate genomic, evolution and molecular breeding research in oat.

Indexed as

AvenaEvolution, MolecularGenome, PlantDroughtsGenetic VariationGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsHaplotypesPhylogenyStress, PhysiologicalTranscriptome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.