Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40835868›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

How the pandemic shaped presenteeism trends between healthcare and non-healthcare workers using the Korean working conditions surveys (2010-2023).

Ari Min, Yoonjung Ji, Wonhee Baek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ari MinDepartment of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea.
Yoonjung JiCollege of Nursing, CHA University, Pocheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.
Wonhee BaekCollege of Nursing, Gyeongsang National University, 816-15 Jinju-daero, Jinju, Gyeongnam, 52727, South Korea. wonnie@gnu.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Presenteeism, the act of working while unwell, presents serious risks to both workers and organizations, especially in healthcare, where it directly affects patient-care quality. The COVID-19 pandemic has intensified these risks, particularly for healthcare workers facing increased workload pressure. Although the impact of presenteeism on workers has been widely studied, a critical gap remains in our understanding of how its patterns have shifted over time. Therefore, this study examined presenteeism trends using the Korean Working Conditions Surveys (2010-2023), focusing on healthcare workers and the effects of age and sex before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. The results indicated that presenteeism peaked in 2014, declined sharply in 2020, and reached its lowest level by 2023. Healthcare workers exhibited high presenteeism rates prior to the pandemic; however, during and after the pandemic, these rates decreased rapidly and ultimately became lower than those of non-healthcare workers. Older and female healthcare workers showed higher presenteeism (i.e., were more likely to work while ill), and these trends persisted even after the pandemic. These findings underscore the need for sex- and age-sensitive workplace interventions for healthcare workers to promote healthier work environments and mitigate the risk of presenteeism.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health PersonnelPresenteeismAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsRepublic of KoreaSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesWorking ConditionsWorkloadWorkplaceYoung AdultCOVID-19Healthcare workersOccupational healthPandemicPresenteeism

Identifiers

PMID40835868
PMCPMC12368207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.