Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40835853›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The clinicopathological and molecular landscape of breast cancer patients: a retrospective study in Sulaimaniyah, Iraq.

Hazha Abdulla Mohammed Ameen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hazha Abdulla Mohammed AmeenBranch of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Sulaimaniyah, Iraq. hazha.amen@univsul.edu.iq.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5283-1912

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer among females and the second leading cause of cancer-related death in women, with different management modalities. To determine the premenopausal BC patients' clinicopathological and molecular landscape. This retrospective study was conducted on 300 primary BC patients aged 25-50 years at Hiwa Hematology and Oncology Hospital, Sulaimaniyah, Iraq, from January 2016 to May 2022. Patients underwent definitive management either before chemotherapy or after neo-adjuvant, and on regular follow-up. Patients were interviewed face to face using a well-designed questionnaire to collect the data, including the type of BC and hormonal status. In this study, most of the studied patients were married (90.3%), aged 45-50 years at diagnosis (36%), aged 13-14 years at the first occurrence of menstruation (70.3%), practised breastfeeding (76.7%), parous (85%), and with no surgical history (92%). Most patients (39%) had luminal B subtype, while the fewest (0.34%) had HER2 overexpression. The overall rate of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) was 66.7%, while the overall rate of mastectomy was 33.3% among patients. Also, 83.79% of the tumour margin was free, 9.03% was involved, and only 5.7% of the tumour margin was close. The tumour margin involved 20.3% and 15.6% of cases diagnosed with multifocal and multicentric tumour masses, respectively. It is concluded that married, aged, breastfed, and parous women showed the highest incidence of BC. The most prominent cancer subtype was luminal B, with the highest level of BCS. Most BC patients had a 2-5 cm, unifocal tumour mass with stage II-A disease.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansIraqMastectomyMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesBreast cancerCancer typeMolecular subtypeSurgical operation

Identifiers

PMID40835853
PMCPMC12368224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.