Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2025
Does mental imagery make a difference in virtual reality simulation training? Results of a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the effect of mental imagery (MI) on the performance in Virtual Reality Simulation Training (VRST) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy training with a box-trainer.
methodsWe randomly assigned novice laparoscopic surgeons taking part in 2023's Davos Course to either receive MI followed by VRST vs. VRST alone. Laparoscopic performance was measured using time taken and instruments' path lengths. We also measured surgical performance in a porcine cholecystectomy model in a box-trainer using a modified objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) score. One-hundred-ten participants in the beginners' module of the Davos Course were eligible, and all could be assessed in this study.
resultsVRST performance did not differ significantly between the two groups. In the cholecystectomy exercise, participants in the MI group performed significantly better in the two subscales 'Respect for Tissue' and 'Use of the Assistant' (p = 0.037 and 0.035, respectively). There was no difference in the other subscales and the overall OSATS Score.
conclusionsMI did not improve young surgeons' overall OSATS scores in a porcine laparoscopic cholecystectomy model. On two subscales of the OSATS scores that reflect skills that are hard to train with VRST, the MI group performed significantly better. Further research involving VRST is warranted to elucidate optimal training modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.