ArticleScientific reports2025
In-silico screening of small compounds against Lassa fever haemorrhagic virus nucleoprotein.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping the scientific landscape of Lassa virus: a 55-year bibliometric study (1970-2025).Science in One Health · 2026Article
- In-silico investigations of bioactive compounds from ginger against Lassa fever virus nucleoprotein.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lassa fever hemorrhagic virus (LFHV) outbreaks in Nigeria continue to increase. With the possibility of a potentially deadly pandemic and the absence of a vaccine, an effective candidate drug that presents with no adverse effects and better clinical outcomes is urgently needed; hence, the aim of the study. Retrieved ligands: 5-(Methylene) evodiamine, N-(2-Fluorobenzoyl) evodiamine, N-[[2-(3-chlorophenyl)-5-(trifluoromethyl) pyrazol-3-yl]methyl]-2-(1-methyl-2,3-dihydroindol-5-yl) propanamide (NCTPMMDP), lauric acid, and sofosbuvir, and the target protein, 3MX5, were prepared and utilised for docking, molecular dynamics simulation, ADMET profiling, and DFT using standard protocols. The docking score for lauric acid was the lowest, with a value of - 6.1, followed by the standard drug and co-crystal control drug with scores of - 9.1 and - 8.9 kcal/mol, respectively. On the other hand, the scores of the other ligands ranged from - 9.5 to - 12.3 kcal/mol. Molecular simulations revealed fluctuations in the RMSD and RMSF values; however, overall, the formed complexes were stable during most of the docking simulation runs. Principal component analysis (PCA) analysis showed that all the ligands, apart from lauric acid, showed better conformational changes within the backbone of the protein. ADMET profiling showed that the ligands were better oral drug candidates than sofosbuvir, as revealed by their better absorption values and absolute compliance with the Lipinski rule of five. The DFT result showed that, apart from lauric acid, all the test ligands possess small energy gaps indicative of high reactivity. Put together, these findings indicate that the test ligands possess anti-LHFV potential that merits further in vivo and in vitro evaluations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.