Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40835689›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Protein-DNA interaction in tight-binding paradigm.

Hamze Mousavi, Ronak Emami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. MACRO-MOLECULAR CROWDING FAVORS WRITHE IN UNWOUND DNA.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hamze MousaviDepartment of Physics, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran. hamze.mousavi@gmail.com.
Ronak EmamiDepartment of Physics, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interaction between protein and DNA across three distinct conformations of protein chains is examined in the framework of band structures and density of states analysis, utilizing a tight-binding Hamiltonian model in conjunction with Green's function technique. At a constant temperature and with a predetermined number of sub-sites on the DNA strand, the spectral diagrams reveal a flat energy dispersion curve for both the protein molecules and the DNA strand independently, demonstrating characteristics akin to those of semiconductors. An increase in the contact points between protein molecules and the DNA strand results in a transition from semiconducting to metallic properties, a change that is also affected by the hydrogen bonds contributed by the mutant protein at these contact points. The electronic characteristics of the protein-DNA system are modulated by the size of the DNA, leading to a conversion of localized states within the structures into less defined energy levels as the length of the DNA strand increases. The influence of temperature on the density of states causes variations in both the peak heights and their positions. The stretching effects of DNA influenced by the presence of protein molecules, result in modifications by redistributing spectral characteristics within the density of states. The interaction between protein and DNA is anticipated to have a direct impact on the electronic properties of DNA, which differ across various protein conformations, thus paving the way for new research opportunities with considerable biological significance.

Indexed as

DNADNA-Binding ProteinsProteinsHydrogen BondingModels, MolecularNucleic Acid ConformationProtein BindingTemperatureThermodynamicsDNADNA-Binding ProteinsProteinsBand structuresDensity of statesDNAProteinTight-binding

Identifiers

PMID40835689
PMCPMC12368152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.