ArticleScientific reports2025
Profiling disease experience in patients living with brain aneurysms by analyzing multimodal clinical data and quality of life measures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgical Safety and Preservation of Quality of Life in Carotid Body Tumour Resection: The Role of Embolisation and Vulnerability Analysis in Working-Age Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Clinicopsychological stratification of recovery outcomes in cerebral aneurysm patients following cluster analysis.PNAS nexus · 2026Article
- SF-36 Quality of Life Outcomes After Right Transradial Cerebral Angiography: A Prospective Short-Term Follow-Up Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To explore the mental and physical health (MH, PH) on individuals living with brain aneurysms and to profile their differences in disease experience. In N = 111 patients the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) was assessed via an online survey; Supplementary data included angiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings (including AI-based brain Lesion Volume analyses in ml, or LV). Correlation and regression analyses were conducted (including biological sex, age, overall brain LV, PH, MH). Disease profiles were determined using principal component analysis. Compared to the German normative cohort, patients exhibited overall lower SF-36 scores. In regression analyses, the DW was predictable by PH (β = 0.345) and MH (β=-0.646; R = 0.557; p < 0.001). Vasospasm severity correlated significantly with LV (r = 0.242, p = 0.043), MH (r=-0.321, p = 0.043), and PH (r=-0.372, p = 0.028). Higher LV were associated with poorer PH (r=-0.502, p = 0.001), unlike MH (p > 0.05). Main disease profiles were identified: (1) those with increased LV post-rupture (high DW); (2) older individuals with stable aneurysms (low DW); (3) revealing a sex disparity in QoL despite similar vasospasm severity; and 4), focused on chronic pain and its impact on daily tasks. Two sub-profiles highlighted trauma-induced impairments, functional disabilities from LV, and persistent anxiety. Reduced thalamic and pallidal volumes were linked to low QoL following subarachnoid hemorrhage. MH has a greater impact on life quality compared to physical disabilities, leading to prolonged DW. A singular physical impairment was rather atypical for a perceived worse outcome. Patient profiles revealed that clinical history, sex, psychological stress, and pain each contribute uniquely to QoL and work capacity. Prioritizing MH in assessing workability and rehabilitation is crucial for survivors' long-term outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.