ArticleScientific reports2025
Personalized blood glucose prediction in type 1 diabetes using meta-learning with bidirectional long short term memory-transformer hybrid model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- An AI-Assisted Tool to Predict Continuous Glucose Monitor Adherence in Children With Type 1 Diabetes in Oman: Protocol for a Multiphase Mixed Methods Translational Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Trustworthy AI for personalized glycemic control: a systematic review and critical appraisal of multimodal forecasting and safety-critical closed-loop control.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026Review
- Nanostructured electrode materials and flexible-substrate engineering for wearable multi-analyte biosensors in diabetes monitoring and personalized care: a comprehensive review.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and precision medicine.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Stochastic virtual population in type 1 diabetes.PloS one · 2026Article
- Interpretable glucose forecasting for type 2 diabetes across traditional, deep, and large language models.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Observational
- A personalized federated learning-based glucose prediction algorithm for high-risk glycemic excursion regions in type 1 diabetes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Personalized blood glucose (BG) prediction in Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) is challenged by significant inter-patient heterogeneity. To address this, we propose BiT-MAML, a hybrid model combining a Bidirectional LSTM-Transformer with Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning. We evaluated our model using a rigorous Leave-One-Patient-Out Cross-Validation (LOPO-CV) on the OhioT1DM dataset, ensuring a fair comparison against re-implemented LSTM and Edge-LSTM baselines. The results show our model achieved a mean RMSE of 24.89 mg/dL for the 30 min prediction horizon, marking a substantial improvement of 19.3% over the standard LSTM and 14.2% over the Edge-LSTM. Notably, our model also achieved the lowest standard deviation (±4.60 mg/dL), indicating more consistent and generalizable performance across the patient cohort. A key finding of our study is the confirmation of significant performance variability across individuals, a known clinical challenge. This was evident as our model's 30 min RMSE ranged from an excellent 19.64 mg/dL to a more challenging 30.57 mg/dL, reflecting the inherent difficulty of personalizing predictions rather than model instability. From a clinical safety perspective, Clarke Error Grid Analysis confirmed the model's robustness, with over 92% of predictions falling within the clinically acceptable Zones A and B. This study concludes that the development of effective personalized BG prediction requires not only advanced model architectures but also robust evaluation methods that transparently report the full spectrum of performance, providing a realistic pathway toward reliable clinical tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.