Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40835648›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

New reference values for ultrasound fetal biometry in Japanese population and comparison with other studies.

Sumito Nagasaki, Keisuke Ishii, Yoshitaka Murakami, Anna Tsutsui, Nobuhiro Hidaka, Hironori Takahashi, Kiyotake Ichizuka, Kei Miyakoshi, Kiyonori Miura, Susumu Miyashita and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sumito NagasakiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Toho University Omori Medical Center, 6-11-1, Omorinishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8540, Japan. sumito.nagasaki@med.toho-u.ac.jp.
Keisuke IshiiDepartment of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Osaka Women's and Children's Hospital, 840, Murodo-cho , Izumi-shi, Osaka, 594-1101, Japan.
Yoshitaka MurakamiDepartment of Medical Statistics, Toho University, 5-21-16, Omorinishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8540, Japan.
Anna TsutsuiDepartment of Medical Statistics, Toho University, 5-21-16, Omorinishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8540, Japan.
Nobuhiro HidakaDepartment of Obstetrics, Fukuoka Children's Hospital, 5-1-1, Kashiiteriha, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka-shi, Fukuoka, 813-0017, Japan.
Hironori TakahashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jichi Medical University Hospital, 3311-1, Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
Kiyotake IchizukaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Showa Medical University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1, Chigasakichuo, Tuzuki-ku, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, 224-8503, Japan.
Kei MiyakoshiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, International Catholic Hospital, 2-5-1, Nakaochiai, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 161-8521, Japan.
Kiyonori MiuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-12-4, Sakamoto, Nagasaki-shi, Nagasaki, 852-8523, Japan.
Susumu MiyashitaDepartment of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Miyagi Children's Hospital, 4-3-17, Ochiai, Aoba-ku, Sendai-shi, Miyagi, 989-3126, Japan.
Yoshimasa KameiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical University Hospital, 38, Morohongo, Moroyama-cho, Iruma-gun, Saitama, 350-0495, Japan.
Masahiko NakataDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Toho University Omori Medical Center, 6-11-1, Omorinishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8540, Japan.
Study Group on New Reference Values for Fetal Biometry in Japan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the decline in birthweights over the past 30 years in Japan and advancements in ultrasound technology, this study aimed to establish new reference values for ultrasound fetal biometry in Japan and to compare them with international and Asian studies. We conducted a cross-sectional prospective study involving singleton pregnancies who received prenatal checkups at obstetric facilities across Japan. During routine prenatal care, ultrasound measurements-biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), and femur length (FL)-were recorded. Estimated fetal weight (EFW) was calculated using both the Shinozuka formula, commonly used in Japan, and the Hadlock-3 formula, widely used internationally. Using the collected data, we developed gestational-age-specific reference values for BPD, HC, AC, FL, and EFW by applying best-fitted fractional polynomial regression, and compared them with existing international standards and reference values from other Asian countries. The mean EFW calculated by the Hadlock formula in this study tended to be smaller than that reported in other international studies, and BPD, HC, AC, and FL were also generally smaller than those observed in other Asian references. These findings indicate that fetal biometry values in the Japanese population are smaller not only than international standards but also compared with those from other Asian countries, and suggest that these population-specific data may contribute to improving the accuracy of fetal growth assessment in Japan and other parts of Asia.

Indexed as

BiometryFetusUltrasonography, PrenatalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEast Asian PeopleFemaleFetal WeightGestational AgeHumansJapanPregnancyProspective StudiesReference ValuesEstimated fetal weightFetal BiometryJapanese populationReference valuesUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID40835648
PMCPMC12368127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.