ArticleTranslational psychiatry2025
Capturing trial-by-trial variability in behaviour: people with Parkinson's disease exhibit a greater rate of short-term fluctuations in response times.
Article in Translational psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Capturing sex differences in spontaneous autonomic fluctuations of resting heart rate using a similarity graph theory approach.Biology of sex differences · 2026Article
- Muscle bursting and corticomotor excitability mark impaired impulse control in Parkinson's disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Average response time is frequently used to reflect executive function. Less often studied is intra-individual variability in response times (IIVRT) which reflects within-person consistency. Higher IIVRT in Parkinson's disease (PD) has been associated with poor executive function but almost exclusively studied using standard deviation (SD). SD provides a standardised measure of inconsistency in RTs but is necessarily calculated as an average measure, precluding any trial-level investigation. Such linear measures cannot capture rapid and spontaneous changes in biological systems such as dopaminergic bursting activity. Therefore, nonlinear measures provide important complementary insights into dopamine-related neurocognition. The nonlinear method of graph theory is one viable approach to capture the complex biological changes in PD and their effect on behaviour. Our primary aim was to increase the understanding of RT fluctuations in PD beyond the use of SD by investigating nonlinear IIVRT measures using graph theory, constituting the first use of this approach on RT data. As hypothesized, PD was associated with a greater rate of trial-by-trial IIVRT compared to healthy older adults. The difference between groups could not be explained simply by worse overall RT performance, as average RT was comparable between groups. Instead, the IIVRT findings reflected impaired consistency in performance for people with PD and specifically a greater rate of short-term fluctuations in behaviour. These novel results indicate that a similarity graph algorithm may be a sensitive tool to capture the rapidly varying changes in behaviour that result from dysfunctional dopamine bursting activity in PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.