Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40835438›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025

The Time Course of Phonological Encoding: Insights from Time-Resolved MVPA.

Giulia Li Calzi, Antje S Meyer, Constantijn L van der Burght

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Giulia Li CalziCentre for the Interdisciplinary Study of Language Evolution, University of Zurich, Zurich 8050, Switzerland giulia.licalzi@uzh.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-0223-8560
Antje S MeyerMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen 6525 XD, The Netherlands.
Constantijn L van der BurghtMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen 6525 XD, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6461-1730

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To produce a word, speakers need to decide which concept to express, select an appropriate item from the mental lexicon, and spell out its phonological form. The temporal dynamics of these processes remain a subject of debate. We investigated the time course of lexical access in picture naming with electroencephalography (EEG). Thirty participants (23 female) named pictures using simple nouns. The pictures varied in conceptual category (animate or inanimate), stress pattern (first or second syllable), and the structure of the first syllable (open or closed). Using time-resolved multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA), we decoded the time course in which each dimension was available during speech preparation. The results demonstrated above-chance decoding of animacy within 100 ms after picture onset, confirming early access to conceptual information. This was followed by stress pattern and syllable structure, at approximately 150 and 250 ms after picture onset, respectively. These results suggest that a word's stress pattern can be retrieved before syllable structure information becomes available. An exploratory analysis demonstrated the availability of the word-initial phoneme within 100 ms after picture onset. This result hints at the possibility that during picture naming, conceptual, phonological, and phonetic information may be accessed rapidly and in parallel.

Indexed as

Pattern Recognition, VisualPhoneticsReaction TimeAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationSpeechTime FactorsYoung AdultEEGlanguage productionmetrical encodingMVPAspeechsyllabification

Identifiers

PMID40835438
PMCPMC12509499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.