ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2025
Automated Midline Shift Detection in Head CT Using Localization and Symmetry Techniques Based on User-Selected Slice.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeMidline shift (MLS) is an intracranial pathology characterized by the displacement of brain parenchyma across the skull's midsagittal axis, typically caused by mass effect from space-occupying lesions or traumatic brain injuries. Prompt detection of MLS is crucial, because delays in identification and intervention can negatively impact patient outcomes. The gap we have addressed in this work is the development of a deep learning algorithm that encompasses the full severity range from mild to severe cases of MLS. Notably, in more severe cases, the mass effect often effaces the septum pellucidum, rendering it unusable as a fiducial point of reference. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe sought to enable rapid and accurate detection of MLS by leveraging advances in artificial intelligence (AI). Using a cohort of 981 patient CT scans with a breadth of cerebral pathologies from our institution, we manually chose an individual slice from each CT scan primarily based on the presence of the lateral ventricles and annotated 400 of these scans for the lateral ventricles and skull-axis midline by using Roboflow. Finally, we trained an AI model based on the You Only Look Once object detection system to identify MLS in the individual slices of the remaining 581 CT scans.
resultsWhen comparing normal and mild cases to moderate and severe cases of MLS detection, our model yielded an area under the curve of 0.79 with a sensitivity of 0.73 and specificity of 0.72 indicating our model is sensitive enough to capture moderate and severe MLS and specific enough to differentiate them from mild and normal cases.
conclusionsWe developed an AI model that reliably identifies the lateral ventricles and the cerebral midline across various pathologies in patient CT scans. Most importantly, our model accurately identifies and stratifies clinically significant and emergent MLS from nonemergent cases. This could serve as a foundational element for a future clinically integrated approach that flags urgent studies for expedited review, potentially facilitating more timely treatment when necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.