ArticleApplied clinical informatics2025
A Systematic Approach to Screen, Identify, and Correct Malfunctioning Interruptive Alerts.
Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interruptive alerts can negatively impact clinical workflows and contribute to alert fatigue, provider frustration, and burnout. Given that interruptive alert overriding is a heterogeneous and recurring phenomenon, occurring across different organizational contexts with varying characteristics and circumstances, we hypothesize a pragmatic approach with multimodal interventions to address malfunctioning alert populations and maintain those contributing to better patient care.This study aimed to develop a systematic approach to screen, identify, and correct malfunctioning interruptive alerts within a tertiary healthcare system.We performed screening by assessing the alert population, exploring available resources, and defining alert population inclusion and exclusion criteria. We identified interruptive alerts and then conducted an exploratory analysis. We shared insights from discussions with our expert panel to validate our findings and find gaps in current alert monitoring. We then performed focus groups and interviews as part of a root cause analysis. To address the findings of these investigations, we prioritized which alerts to improve, evaluated solutions, and recommended steps to improve our governance structure.We developed an approach to assess around 1,500 unique alerts in a tertiary center from January to June 2023. We introduced two approaches to visually analyze alert populations: alert-focused analysis and people- and systems-focused analysis. We utilized an expert panel to further enhance the power and speed of alert evaluation and then investigated one emerging alert with focus groups, identifying root causes for its malfunction. This alert demonstrated how enterprise practice changes, coupled with design and cultural issues, can trigger significant alert malfunctions.A multi-modal intervention approach is needed to evaluate interruptive alerts and act quickly on findings. Utilizing both analytical and nonanalytical methods can work in synergy to facilitate this framework. Such approaches may reduce time and be valuable tools for optimally allocating resources to tackle institutional alert challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.