ReviewInternational journal of pharmaceutics2025
Recent advances in drug delivery and treatment strategies for acute myeloid leukemia.
Review in International journal of pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brusatol Triggers Cell Cycle Arrest and Apoptosis, Disrupts Sterol Biosynthesis, and Enhances the Anti-Leukemic Activity of Venetoclax in AML Cells.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2026Article
- Therapeutic Potential of Ginger Rhizomes (Zingiber officinale) on Leukemia.Biotechnology and applied biochemistry · 2026Review
- Co-Expression of IL-2 Enhances the Efficacy of FLT3-CAR-γδT Cells in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Cancers · 2026Article
- Hijacking the helpers: platelet and neutrophil trafficking in AML and therapeutic exploitation.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- CPX-351 and the Frontier of Nanoparticle-Based Therapeutics in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Novel therapeutic strategies targeting resistance mechanisms in hematologic malignancies: from BCL2 inhibition to immunomodulatory approaches.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains a highly heterogeneous and aggressive hematologic malignancy with a poor prognosis. Although significant advancements have been made in chemotherapeutic regimens, targeted therapies (e.g., FLT3 and BCL2 inhibitors), and immunotherapies such as antibody-drug conjugates and CAR-T cells, treatment outcomes remain unsatisfactory, due to chemoresistance, off-target toxicities, disease relapse, and limited bioavailability. To address these limitations, nanomedicine and drug delivery systems have emerged as a promising approach to enhance therapeutic efficacy and minimizing adverse effects. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current AML treatments, highlighting both achievements and persistent limitations, with a particular focus on gene therapies under investigation. We then delve into various nanocarrier platforms, mainly lipid-based and polymer-based nanoparticles (NPs), examining their potential to overcome existing clinical challenges in AML therapy by improving drug stability, bioavailability, and leukemic cell targeting. Recent innovations in targeted formulations, such as antibody-, peptide-, and nanobody-conjugated drug delivery systems, have been designed to improve AML specificity. Finally, we discuss the key challenges and future directions in AML treatment, emphasizing the need for continued research in biomaterial innovation, formulation optimization, and precision-targeted approaches to enhance patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.