Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40834881›Full record

Trial reportBlood2025

Challenging the concept of functional high-risk myeloma through transcriptional and genetic profiling.

Sina A Beer, David A Cairns, Charlotte Pawlyn, Amy Holroyd, Elsa Ferris, Gordon Cook, Mark Drayson, Kevin Boyd, Paula Proszek, Faith E Davies and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01554852 (Randomised Comparisons, in Myeloma Patients of All Ages, of Thalidomide, Lenalidomide, Carfilzomib and Bortezomib Induction Combinations, and of Lenalidomide and Combination Lenalidomide Vorinostat as Maintenance), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01554852 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Randomised Comparisons, in Myeloma Patients of All Ages, of Thalidomide, Lenalidomide, Carfilzomib and Bortezomib Induction Combinations, and of Lenalidomide and Combination Lenalidomide Vorinostat as Maintenance (Myeloma XI)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of LeedsRan2010 to 2022Enrolled4,420ConditionsMultiple MyelomaArmsInduction (intensive pathway) - cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide, & dexamethasone (CRD) regimen, Induction (intensive pathway) - cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, & dexamethasone (CTD) regimen, Induction (intensive pathway) - carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide, & dexamethasone (CCRD) regimen, Induction (non-intensive pathway) - cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide, & dexamethasone attenuated (CRDa) regimen, Induction (non-intensive pathway) - cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, & dexamethasone attenuated (CTDa) regimen
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Sina A BeerDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0004-0609-2644
David A CairnsLeeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2338-0179
Charlotte PawlynDepartment of Haematology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7190-0028
Amy HolroydDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Elsa FerrisDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Gordon CookLeeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1717-0412
Mark DraysonDepartment of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Kevin BoydDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Paula ProszekClinical Genomics Department, Molecular Diagnostics, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom.
Faith E DaviesDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
Ruth de TuteHaematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Matthew JennerDepartment of Haematology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0216-7464
Gareth J MorganDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
Roger OwenHaematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Michael HubankClinical Genomics Department, Molecular Diagnostics, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2901-0742
Richard HoulstonDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Graham JacksonDepartment of Haematology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Martin F KaiserDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3677-4804

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractFunctional high-risk (FHR) multiple myeloma (MM) is defined as an unexpected, early relapse (ER) of disease in the absence of baseline molecular or clinical risk factors (RF), making FHR MM inherently dependent on which RFs were assessed at diagnosis, and what treatment patients received. To establish the true incidence of FHR, we analyzed uniformly treated, transplant-eligible patients from the Myeloma-XI (MyXI) trial that had been profiled for the International Myeloma Society and Working Group (IMS/IMWG) defined high-risk cytogenetic aberrations (HRCA), and the SKY92 gene expression HR signature (GEP-HR). A total of 135 MyXI patients were studied, with a median follow-up of 88 months; 25 (18.5%) experienced ER, defined as relapse <18 months from maintenance randomization post-autologous stem-cell transplantation. Hereof, 15 (60%) were IMS/IMWG-HR at diagnosis, of whom 8 were also GEP-HR. Another 6 patients were GEP-HR only and would have been missed by IMS/IMWG-HR. Among 4 patients with IMS/IMWG- and GEP-standard risk, 2 had isolated HR markers at diagnosis, leaving only 2 patients (8% of ER; 1.5% of all) truly meeting all FHR-criteria. Combined IMS/IMWG-HR and GEP-HR profiling identified 84% of ER, and differentiated long-term outcome across all 135 patients: co-occurring IMS/IMWG and GEP-HR was associated with very short overall survival compared to the absence of both (HR = 13.1; 95% CI, 6.5-26.1, P < .0001), followed by GEP-HR only (HR = 5.1; 95% CI, 2.4-11.1, P < .0001) and IMS/IMWG-HR only (HR = 3.2; 95% CI, 1.6-6.2, P = .0007). Our results support more comprehensive baseline diagnostic profiling to identify those at risk of ER upfront. The trials were registered at the ISRCTN Registry as ISRCTN49407852 and at clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01554852.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingMultiple MyelomaAdultAgedChromosome AberrationsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID40834881
PMCPMC12824701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.