ArticleHearing research2025
Central auditory and tinnitus consequences of pediatric chronic otitis media with effusion.
Article in Hearing research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Surgical intervention for pediatric chronic otitis media with effusion (COME) reverses hearing loss imposed by fluid in the middle ear space. Current recommendations are treatment implementation for bilateral COME, but only treatment consideration for unilateral COME. The latter recommendation could result in unrecognized binaural processing impairment and tinnitus arising from interaural threshold differences. This prospective, cross-sectional study contrasted three cohorts (A, normal hearing and without COME, N = 12; B, bilateral COME, N = 11; and, C, unilateral COME, N = 7) using a portable spatial release from masking (SRM) test protocol and tinnitus loudness measurement. The participant ages ranged from 5.4 to 13.7 years (mean=9) and average pure tone thresholds in the poorer ear of COME cohorts were comparable at ∼30 dB. The unilateral COME cohort showed poorer SRM performance (p = 0.012). Children with greater interaural threshold asymmetry were more likely to have a greater reduction in benefit from spatial release from masking, regardless of COME status or degree of hearing loss (F = 5.1, p = 0.033). Tinnitus prevalence was 71 % in unilateral COME and 55 % in bilateral COME cohorts. Tinnitus loudness was associated with mood symptoms severity and hearing-related quality of life. Early evidence for significant central auditory and tinnitus consequences of pediatric unilateral COME prompts reappraisal of treatment recommendations that call for only consideration of surgical evacuation of middle ear fluid and placement of a tympanostomy tube. Longitudinal studies to examine central auditory function in children with COME that deploy intervention arms will be necessary to support any change to current clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.