Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40834492›Full record

ArticleSurgery2025

Impact of the 2023 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services policy change on carotid artery stenting use among Medicare beneficiaries.

Courtenay M Holscher, Chen Dun, Y H Andrew Wu, Midori White, David P Stonko, Marc Schermerhorn, James H Black, Christopher J Abularrage, Jesse A Columbo, Caitlin W Hicks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Courtenay M HolscherDivision of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/cmholscher.
Chen DunDivision of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/Chen_Dun.
Y H Andrew WuDivision of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/andrewyhwu.
Midori WhiteDivision of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/MidoriWhite.
David P StonkoDivision of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Marc SchermerhornSection of Vascular Surgery, Heart and Vascular Center, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.
James H BlackDivision of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/JamesHBlackMD.
Christopher J AbularrageDivision of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Jesse A ColumboDivision of Vascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Caitlin W HicksDivision of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: chicks11@jhmi.edu.

Funding

Risk Factors and Outcomes Associated with Late-Life Diabetic Peripheral NeuropathyK23DK124515 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HICKS, CAITLIN WHITNEY · 2020 to 2024
$898k
Comparative-Effectiveness of Procedures for Carotid RevascularizationK08HL165087 · NHLBI · DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK CLINIC · PI Jesse A Columbo · 2023 to 2026
$587k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL165087NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK124515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOn 11 October 2023, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services expanded the indications for carotid artery stenting to include standard risk patients with symptomatic ≥50% and asymptomatic ≥70% carotid artery stenosis, providing surgeons an option between carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting. This decision followed arguments both for and against the change by various professional societies, including opposition by the Society for Vascular Surgery. We sought to examine the impact of the change in policy with use of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy.

methodsWe used 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims data to identify all patients who underwent carotid artery stenting or carotid endarterectomy between 1 January 2017 and 30 September 2024. Patients without 12 months of continuous Medicare enrollment before the procedure and/or younger than 18 years of age were excluded. Carotid artery stenting included both transfemoral and transcarotid revascularization. We evaluated the trends in use of carotid artery stenting compared with carotid endarterectomy overall and stratified by symptomatic status using hierarchical logistic regression models adjusting for patient and physician-level characteristics. We conducted an interrupted time series analysis with the time break set at October 2023 to evaluate the impact of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services policy change on carotid artery stenting use.

resultsThere were 395,092 carotid revascularizations performed during the study period (median age 75.1 years, 59.9% male, 3.5% Black race), including 45.0% for symptomatic compared with 55.0% for asymptomatic disease, and 76.7% carotid endarterectomy compared with 23.3% carotid artery stenting. The proportion of carotid revascularizations performed using carotid artery stenting significantly increased over time (2017: 13.0% vs 2024: 37.99%; P < .001), including for both symptomatic (2017: 15.6% vs 2024: 40.9%; P < .001) and asymptomatic patients (2017: 11.0% vs 2024: 21.9%; P < .001). After adjusting for patient and treating physician-level variables, the use of carotid artery stenting vs carotid endarterectomy increased by 28% per year since 2017 overall (adjusted odds ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-1.29), including 25% in symptomatic patients (adjusted odds ratio, 1.25, 95% confidence interval, 1.24-1.27) and 31% in asymptomatic patients (adjusted odds ratio, 1.31, 95% confidence interval, 1.30-1.32). Based on the interrupted time series analysis, there was a significant decrease in carotid endarterectomy use (P = .001) and increase in carotid artery stenting use (P = .003) after the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services policy change on carotid artery stenting use in October 2023.

conclusionThere has been a significant increase in carotid artery stenting use with a concomitant decline in carotid endarterectomy use since the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services decision to expand carotid artery stenting indications. Continued monitoring of these trends will be important to ensure optimal patient outcomes and appropriate use of carotid revascularization strategies.

Indexed as

Carotid StenosisCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.Endarterectomy, CarotidMedicareStentsAgedAged, 80 and overFee-for-Service PlansFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40834492
PMCPMC12370274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.