ArticleInflammatory bowel diseases2025
Real-World Experience with Upadacitinib for Pediatric Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: An International Multicenter Retrospective Study from the Pediatric IBD Porto Group of ESPGHAN.
Article in Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel Agents on the Therapeutic Horizon For Paediatric Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: An Analysis of Clinical Trials Registries.Paediatric drugs · 2026Review
- Risks of Undertreatment and Overtreatment in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Navigating the Balance.Paediatric drugs · 2026Review
- Advances in the Management of Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: From Biologics to Small Molecules.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundData on upadacitinib therapy for pediatric acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASC) are scarce. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib as a salvage therapy in pediatric ASC.
methodsChildren and adolescents with ASC who were treated with upadacitinib for the induction of remission were enrolled in this retrospective multicenter study. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data as well as adverse events (AEs) were recorded after the 8-week induction period and throughout 26 weeks of therapy. Analyses were based on the intention-to-treat principal.
resultsTwenty-two patients were included (median age 15.7 [interquartile range 13.5-16.6] years, 12 hospitalized), all with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy refractory disease. Ten patients were treated with corticosteroids at baseline, and upadacitinib was added to an ongoing biologic therapy in five patients. At week 8 of therapy, 11 (50%) patients of the cohort remained colectomy-free and in corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CFR), and 17 (77%) patients remained colectomy-free. Normal C-reactive protein (CRP) was achieved in 9 of 11 (82%) patients who were in CFR, and fecal calprotectin <150 mcg/g in 4 of 6 (67%) patients with available data. By week 26, 14 (64%) were in CFR and 16 (73%) patients remained colectomy-free. All these patients had normal CRP levels, and 4 of 7 patients with available data had fecal calprotectin <150 mcg/g. Twelve patients reported AEs, including two serious AEs of an appendiceal neuroendocrine tumor and cytomegalovirus colitis.
conclusionUpadacitinib is an effective induction therapy for children and adolescents with ASC after failing anti-TNF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.