Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40834168›Full record

ReviewCritical care science2025

Understanding artificial intelligence in critical care: opportunities, risks, and practical applications.

Naira Link Woite, Rodrigo R Gameiro, Marianna Leite, Alessandro Hammond, Marisa Cobanaj, Leo Anthony Celi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Naira Link WoiteDepartment of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center - Boston, Massachusetts, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3145-7903
Rodrigo R GameiroDepartment of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center - Boston, Massachusetts, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9600-6228
Marianna LeiteFaculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade São Paulo - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5816-1438
Alessandro HammondHarvard University - Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2681-614X
Marisa CobanajOncoRay - Institute of Radiooncology, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology - Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2904-267X
Leo Anthony CeliDepartment of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center - Boston, Massachusetts, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6712-6626

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence technologies are rapidly advancing and significantly impacting healthcare, particularly in critical care environments where rapid, precise decision-making is crucial. They promise reductions in clinical errors, enhanced diagnostic accuracy, optimized treatment plans, and better resource allocation. Artificial intelligence applications are widespread across medical fields, with numerous artificial intelligence/machine learning-enabled medical devices approved by regulatory bodies, like the US Food and Drug Administration, aiding in diagnosis, monitoring, and personalized patient care. However, integrating artificial intelligence into healthcare presents challenges, notably the potential to exacerbate existing biases and disparities, especially when systems are trained on homogeneous datasets lacking diversity. Biased artificial intelligence can negatively affect patient outcomes for underrepresented groups, perpetuating health disparities. Additional concerns include data privacy and security, lack of transparency, algorithmic bias, and regulatory hurdles. Addressing these risks requires ensuring diverse and representative datasets, implementing robust auditing and monitoring practices, enhancing transparency, involving diverse perspectives in artificial intelligence development, and promoting critical thinking among healthcare professionals. Furthermore, the environmental impact of artificial intelligence, huge models reliant on energy-intensive data centers, poses challenges due to increased greenhouse gas emissions and resource consumption, disproportionately affecting low-income countries and exacerbating global inequalities. Systemic changes driven by corporate responsibility, government policy, and adopting sustainable artificial intelligence practices within healthcare are necessary. This narrative review explores the current landscape of artificial intelligence in healthcare, highlighting its potential benefits and delineating associated risks and challenges, underscoring the importance of mitigating biases and environmental impacts to ensure equitable and sustainable integration of artificial intelligence technologies in healthcare settings.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCritical CareHumans

Identifiers

PMID40834168
PMCPMC12614954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.