ReviewCritical care science2025
Understanding artificial intelligence in critical care: opportunities, risks, and practical applications.
Review in Critical care science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cultivating adaptive expertise in critical care: reimagining intensive care unit education in the era of Artificial Intelligence.Critical care science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence technologies are rapidly advancing and significantly impacting healthcare, particularly in critical care environments where rapid, precise decision-making is crucial. They promise reductions in clinical errors, enhanced diagnostic accuracy, optimized treatment plans, and better resource allocation. Artificial intelligence applications are widespread across medical fields, with numerous artificial intelligence/machine learning-enabled medical devices approved by regulatory bodies, like the US Food and Drug Administration, aiding in diagnosis, monitoring, and personalized patient care. However, integrating artificial intelligence into healthcare presents challenges, notably the potential to exacerbate existing biases and disparities, especially when systems are trained on homogeneous datasets lacking diversity. Biased artificial intelligence can negatively affect patient outcomes for underrepresented groups, perpetuating health disparities. Additional concerns include data privacy and security, lack of transparency, algorithmic bias, and regulatory hurdles. Addressing these risks requires ensuring diverse and representative datasets, implementing robust auditing and monitoring practices, enhancing transparency, involving diverse perspectives in artificial intelligence development, and promoting critical thinking among healthcare professionals. Furthermore, the environmental impact of artificial intelligence, huge models reliant on energy-intensive data centers, poses challenges due to increased greenhouse gas emissions and resource consumption, disproportionately affecting low-income countries and exacerbating global inequalities. Systemic changes driven by corporate responsibility, government policy, and adopting sustainable artificial intelligence practices within healthcare are necessary. This narrative review explores the current landscape of artificial intelligence in healthcare, highlighting its potential benefits and delineating associated risks and challenges, underscoring the importance of mitigating biases and environmental impacts to ensure equitable and sustainable integration of artificial intelligence technologies in healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.