ArticleEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2025
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Palliative Care Knowledge Questionnaire for PEACE (PEACE-Q) in Brazilian Portuguese.
Article in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe PEACE-Q was translated into Brazilian Portuguese and validated for use with medical residents. The Brazilian version of the instrument showed acceptable consistency, moderate reliability, and appropriate validity for assessing palliative care knowledge among this population.
backgroundPerformance was < 70% in 10 of the 33 items.
backgroundLowest performance domains were Oncologic Pain and Opioid Side Effects.
backgroundResidents in clinical specialties outperformed those in surgical or mixed specialties.
backgroundResidents with ≥3 years of training outperformed those on their first 2 years.
objectiveTo translate, cross-culturally adapt, and validate the Palliative Care Knowledge Questionnaire for PEACE (PEACE-Q) in Brazilian Portuguese.
methodsThis study followed five steps: translation, back-translation, cultural adaptation, pre-test, and test-retest. Pre-test (n=20) and test-retest (n=63) were conducted on medical residents from Santa Casa Hospital in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. We determined the content validity index, Kuder-Richardson-20 (KR-20) value, and intraclass correlation coefficient. The performances of residents with different years of training and specialty areas were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests.
resultsThe translated version of the instrument comprised 33 items divided into nine domains, with a content validity index of 0.95. The test-retest on medical residents showed an internal consistency (KR-20) of 0.60 (95% confidence interval (95%CI)=0.54-0.66) and intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.71 (95%CI=0.51-0.82). Medical residents of clinical specialties showed better overall scores than those of surgical or mixed specialties (median scores [IQR]: 27.0 [25.0-28.0], 26.0 [23.0-28.0], and 23.5 [21.5-25.5], respectively; [p=0.013]). Regarding year of training, medical residents on year three or beyond had higher scores in the "Opioid Side Effects" domain than those on the first 2 years [median scores (IQR): 2.0 (2.0-3.0) versus 2.0 (1.0-2.0); p=0.03].
conclusionThe Brazilian version of the PEACE-Q demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and moderate reliability and appears appropriate for assessing the palliative care knowledge of Brazilian medical residents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.