ArticleRevista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo2025
Risk of oral candidiasis: profile analysis of patients admitted to the dermatology clinic of a tertiary hospital in southeast of Brazil.
Article in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Candida genus colonizes the oral mucosa of immunocompetent individuals and healthy people, which is maintained by the innate immune system. However, any disturbance in this relationship, such as immunodepression, can turn this normally harmless yeast into a dangerous pathogen. This study evaluates the prevalence and risk factors for oral candidiasis (OC) among patients hospitalized in the dermatology department of a tertiary public hospital and identifies the Candida species involved. This cross-sectional study involves 240 patients. Oral candidiasis was diagnosed via clinical evaluation and mycological examination, with species confirmed using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. The prevalence of Candida species was 32.1%, in which C. albicans was the most common (92.1% of OC cases), followed by Nakaseomyces glabrata, Pichia kudriavzevii, C. tropicalis, and C. parapsilosis. Univariate analysis indicated that aging, use of oral prostheses, need for dental intervention, immunosuppression, and autoimmune diseases increase the risk of candidiasis. Multivariate analysis confirmed that aging, necessity for dental treatment, and immunosuppression were in 80% of OC cases. Given the great prevalence of oral candidiasis in hospitalized patients, dentists need to assess them for oral candidiasis and provide information on oral hygiene and healthy practices. Although C. albicans is the main microorganism responsible for these infections, other species have also been identified, highlighting the need for immediate identification and awareness of risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.