ArticlePLoS genetics2025
Rapid emergence of non-autonomous elements may stop P-element invasions in the absence of a piRNA-based host defence.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transposable element (TE) invasions pose risks to both the TE and the host. All copies of a TE may be lost via genetic drift, or host populations may suffer fitness declines, potentially leading to extinction. By monitoring invasions of the P-element in experimental D. melanogaster populations for over 100 generations, we uncovered a novel risk for invading TEs. In two replicate populations, the P-element rapidly multiplied until a piRNA-based host defence emerged, leading to the plateauing of TE copy numbers. However, in one population (R2), P-element copy numbers stabilised at a significantly lower level, despite the absence of a piRNA-based host defence. We find that this stabilisation was likely driven by the propagation of non-autonomous insertions, characterised by internal-deletions, which out-competed the autonomous full-length insertions. Such a rapid proliferation of non-autonomous insertions could account for the high prevalence of P-element insertions with internal-deletions observed in natural D. melanogaster populations. Our work reveals that TEs may stochastically sabotage their own spread in populations due to the emergence of non-autonomous elements, rendering the establishment of a host defence unnecessary. The proliferation of non-autonomous elements may also lead into an evolutionary dead end, where affected populations are resistant to re-invasion (e.g. following recurrent horizontal transfer), yet are unable to infect other species due to a lack of autonomous insertions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.